Karnataka High Court
Civil LawInsurance Law

Self-employed deceased aged 50–60 are entitled to a 10% addition for future prospects.

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs SMT. FAKKIRI BALU ALIAS BABU JADHAV

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Self-employed deceased aged 50–60 are entitled to a 10% addition for future prospects.. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER vs SMT. FAKKIRI BALU ALIAS BABU JADHAV. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 5 February 2018, Balu @ Babu Jadhav was a pillion passenger on a motorcycle that was struck by a Tata Tempo; he sustained fatal injuries.

Source reference: p. 3

His family sought compensation, alleging that he worked as a mason and earned ₹450 per day.

Source reference: p. 4

The Tribunal awarded ₹20,06,450, including loss of dependency calculated using monthly income of ₹13,250 and a 40% addition for future prospects.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The insurer appealed, challenging the income assessment and future-prospects addition.

Source reference: p. 7
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required modification, particularly as to the deceased’s income and future prospects.

Source reference: p. 7

2. What order should follow.

Source reference: p. 7
03

Law Applied

Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, an aggrieved party may appeal a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award.

Source reference: pp. 2, 11

Where a claimant produces no documentary proof of income, the Karnataka Legal Services Authority’s notional-income chart may guide the assessment; for an accident in 2018, the applicable monthly income was ₹11,750.

Source reference: p. 8

Under National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, a self-employed deceased aged between 50 and 60 is entitled to a 10% addition for future prospects.

Source reference: p. 8

The Court also accepted the multiplier of 11 and a one-fourth deduction for personal expenses in light of the deceased’s dependants.

Source reference: p. 9
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the claimants had not proved the deceased’s income, so the Tribunal’s use of ₹13,250 per month lacked a basis and should be replaced by the applicable chart figure of ₹11,750.

Source reference: p. 8

Because the deceased was self-employed and aged 53, the Tribunal’s 40% future-prospects addition was reduced to 10% under Pranay Sethi; the multiplier of 11 and one-fourth deduction were retained.

Source reference: pp. 8–9

The Court left the Tribunal’s awards under the other heads undisturbed.

Source reference: p. 9

The judgment contains differing figures for loss of dependency in its calculation and table; the operative award specifies total compensation of ₹14,46,575.

Source reference: pp. 9–11
05

Holding

The appeal was partly allowed, and the Tribunal’s award was modified.

The claimants were held entitled to ₹14,46,575, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

Source reference: pp. 10–11

The insurer was directed to deposit the compensation with accrued interest within eight weeks of receiving the certified judgment; apportionment, disbursement, and deposit were to follow the Tribunal’s order.

Source reference: p. 11

No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: p. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGERvsSMT. FAKKIRI BALU ALIAS BABU JADHAV

Karnataka High Court · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment