Facts
The applicant had been granted short-term bail for four weeks from his release on 25 September 2026 to undergo coronary angiography
Source reference: para. 5After experiencing chest pain and other symptoms, he underwent angiography on 13 October 2026. The report disclosed serious blockages in multiple coronary arteries, and angioplasty was recommended for 23 October 2026—the date his short-term bail was due to expire
Source reference: paras. 6–11He sought a further two weeks of bail to undergo angioplasty and receive immediate follow-up care, undertaking to surrender when the extended period ended
Source reference: paras. 13–14The informant opposed the application, but did not dispute that angiography had occurred and angioplasty had been recommended
Source reference: para. 15Issues
1. Whether the applicant’s short-term bail should be extended to permit him to undergo the medically recommended angioplasty and receive immediate follow-up care
Source reference: paras. 13, 16–172. Whether the extension should be made subject to surrender after the extended period and notification to the Court
Source reference: para. 18Law Applied
The Court cited no statute, precedent, or specific legal test.
Source reference: no citationIt applied the principles reflected in its short-term bail order: where an immediate medical requirement is supported by the record, and refusal of an extension may threaten the applicant’s life, the Court may extend short-term bail on humanitarian grounds, while requiring the applicant to surrender at the end of the extension
Source reference: paras. 16–18Reasoning
The angiography disclosed serious coronary blockages, and the treating doctor had recommended angioplasty requiring hospital admission on 23 October 2026, the date the applicant’s bail expired
Source reference: paras. 10–11, 16Given the urgency of the treatment and the potential threat to the applicant’s life if immediate medical attention were unavailable, the Court considered the informant’s objection insufficient to defeat the application
Source reference: paras. 15–17It therefore granted a limited extension while preserving the requirement that the applicant return to custody afterward
Source reference: paras. 17–18Holding
The Court allowed the time-extension application and extended the applicant’s short-term bail by two weeks from its expiry on 23 October 2026, to enable the angioplasty and related care
The applicant was directed to surrender before the court concerned when the extended period expired and to inform the High Court of his surrender
Source reference: para. 18Original Court PDF
DILBAGH SINGHvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
