Karnataka High Court
Property and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

SLAO must pass a consent award extending the 2025 Government Order’s benefits to the petitioners.

SHRI. SATISH S/O. SHEKAPPA PANCHAGAVI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
SLAO must pass a consent award extending the 2025 Government Order’s benefits to the petitioners.. SHRI. SATISH S/O. SHEKAPPA PANCHAGAVI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners sought a consent award for their lands acquired under notification dated 7 October 2022, with the benefit of the Government Order dated 9 October 2025.

Source reference: p. 1–4

Alternatively, they sought an award under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Source reference: p. 1–4

The Court recorded that the issue was covered by prior Coordinate Bench orders and disposed of the petition on that basis.

Source reference: p. 4–6
02

Issues

Whether the petitioners were entitled to a consent award for their lands under the notification dated 7 October 2022, extending the benefit of the Government Order dated 9 October 2025.

Source reference: p. 3–6

Whether the petitioners were entitled to an award under the 2013 Act as an alternative to a consent award.

Source reference: p. 3–4
03

Law Applied

The Court relied on the Government Order dated 9 October 2025 and Coordinate Bench decisions concerning its application to land acquisition consent awards.

Source reference: p. 4–5

The cited precedent directed that the Government Order’s benefit be extended in accordance with law, if not already paid, by drawing a consent award; it also directed the petitioners in that matter to appear before the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO).

Source reference: p. 4–5

The Court applied those directions to the present case, which it held to be identical in issue.

Source reference: p. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court found the dispute identical to matters already resolved by Coordinate Benches and adopted the same approach.

Source reference: p. 4–6

It therefore directed the SLAO to extend the 9 October 2025 Government Order’s benefit and pass a consent award for the petitioners’ lands acquired under the 7 October 2022 notification.

Source reference: p. 4–6

The order contains no separate determination of the alternative claim under the 2013 Act.

Source reference: p. 4–6
05

Holding

The petition was partly allowed.

Respondent No. 5, the SLAO, was directed to pass a consent award for the petitioners’ lands under the 7 October 2022 notification, extending the benefit of the Government Order dated 9 October 2025.

Source reference: p. 6–7

The petitioners were directed to appear before the SLAO on 12 October 2026 at 11:00 a.m.; the SLAO was directed to conduct further proceedings in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and within nine months from the date of first appearance.

Source reference: p. 6–7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHRI. SATISH S/O. SHEKAPPA PANCHAGAVIvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment