Facts
The applicant, Shri Abdul Latif, is a Transport Officer under the Director of Transport, Andaman and Nicobar Administration
Source reference: p.1The representation requested an amendment to Clause 11 of the Recruitment Rules for the post of Assistant Engineer to include "Transport Officer" as a feeder post for promotion, alongside the existing categories of Junior Engineer and Chargemen
Source reference: para. 1During the proceedings, the applicant’s counsel requested that the OA be disposed of by directing the respondents to decide on the pending representation within a fixed timeline and to stay any promotions to the subject post in the interim
Source reference: para. 2The respondents raised no objection to this proposal
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the Respondent No. 3 should be directed to consider the applicant’s representation for amending the Recruitment Rules for the post of Assistant Engineer
Source reference: para. 1-22. Whether an interim stay on promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer should be granted pending the disposal of said representation
Source reference: para. 2, 5Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the principle of administrative equity and the requirement for statutory authorities to pass "reasoned and speaking orders" when disposing of representations from employees
Source reference: para. 5The court refrained from a merit-based review of the Recruitment Rules, adhering to the principle that it is primarily the domain of the executive to frame or amend such rules, provided the administrative process for considering grievances is duly followed
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Tribunal characterized the applicant’s request as "innocuous," as it did not ask for a final adjudication on the eligibility criteria but merely for the consideration of a pending grievance
Source reference: para. 5Since the respondents consented to the proposal, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to delve into the merits of the case
Source reference: para. 3, 6To ensure the representation process remained meaningful and to preserve the status quo, the Tribunal linked the timeline for the administrative decision to a temporary bar on filling the vacancies in question. The Tribunal reasoned that allowing promotions to proceed under the contested rules before the representation was decided would potentially prejudice the applicant's claims
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the OA by directing Respondent No. 3 to consider the applicant’s representation dated 02.03.2026, treating the OA as a supplementary part of that representation
The Respondent must communicate its decision via a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified order
Source reference: para. 5The Tribunal further ordered that no promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer shall be given effect on the basis of the current Recruitment Rules until the representation is decided
Source reference: para. 5All merits and legal points remain open for future consideration
Source reference: para. 6No order as to costs was made
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
Abdul LatifvsTRANSPORT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in