CAT - Kolkata

Stay on promotions pending consideration of representation for inclusion of additional feeder categories in recruitment rules.

Abdul Latif vs TRANSPORT

CAT - KolkataJUDGMENT: April 02, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Shri Abdul Latif, is a Transport Officer under the Director of Transport, Andaman and Nicobar Administration

Source reference: p.1

The representation requested an amendment to Clause 11 of the Recruitment Rules for the post of Assistant Engineer to include "Transport Officer" as a feeder post for promotion, alongside the existing categories of Junior Engineer and Chargemen

Source reference: para. 1

During the proceedings, the applicant’s counsel requested that the OA be disposed of by directing the respondents to decide on the pending representation within a fixed timeline and to stay any promotions to the subject post in the interim

Source reference: para. 2

The respondents raised no objection to this proposal

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the Respondent No. 3 should be directed to consider the applicant’s representation for amending the Recruitment Rules for the post of Assistant Engineer

Source reference: para. 1-2

2. Whether an interim stay on promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer should be granted pending the disposal of said representation

Source reference: para. 2, 5
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the principle of administrative equity and the requirement for statutory authorities to pass "reasoned and speaking orders" when disposing of representations from employees

Source reference: para. 5

The court refrained from a merit-based review of the Recruitment Rules, adhering to the principle that it is primarily the domain of the executive to frame or amend such rules, provided the administrative process for considering grievances is duly followed

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal characterized the applicant’s request as "innocuous," as it did not ask for a final adjudication on the eligibility criteria but merely for the consideration of a pending grievance

Source reference: para. 5

Since the respondents consented to the proposal, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to delve into the merits of the case

Source reference: para. 3, 6

To ensure the representation process remained meaningful and to preserve the status quo, the Tribunal linked the timeline for the administrative decision to a temporary bar on filling the vacancies in question. The Tribunal reasoned that allowing promotions to proceed under the contested rules before the representation was decided would potentially prejudice the applicant's claims

Source reference: para. 5
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the OA by directing Respondent No. 3 to consider the applicant’s representation dated 02.03.2026, treating the OA as a supplementary part of that representation

The Respondent must communicate its decision via a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified order

Source reference: para. 5

The Tribunal further ordered that no promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer shall be given effect on the basis of the current Recruitment Rules until the representation is decided

Source reference: para. 5

All merits and legal points remain open for future consideration

Source reference: para. 6

No order as to costs was made

Source reference: para. 7
CAT - Kolkata

Original Court PDF

Abdul LatifvsTRANSPORT

CAT - Kolkata · April 02, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment