Facts
The Petitioner, a street vendor, sought directions to the Respondents to allow him to vend peacefully from his site at Netaji Subhash Marg, near Lal Qila, Delhi
Source reference: para. 2The Petitioner holds a provisional Certificate of Vending (CoV) under the category of ‘Food/Snack with gas cylinder’ for the City-SP Zone
Source reference: para. 3He alleged harassment by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and Delhi Police
Source reference: para. 5The MCD contended that the site in question is a designated "Non-vending zone"
Source reference: para. 6Issues
1. Whether a street vendor operating in a non-vending zone can be removed without the state providing an alternative vending site
Source reference: para. 82. What regulatory conditions should be imposed on a vendor using a gas cylinder to ensure public safety and hygiene
Source reference: para. 10Law Applied
Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which governs the relocation of street vendors
Source reference: para. 11The Court further applied the principles established by the Supreme Court in Malkit Singh and Anr. v. State of U.T. Chandigarh and Ors. (2026), which held that the State has a duty to actively support the transition of displaced vendors to lawful vending zones to protect their right to livelihood
Source reference: para. 7-8Reasoning
The Court balanced the Petitioner’s right to earn a livelihood with the regulatory necessity of maintaining non-vending zones.
Source reference: para. 7Citing the Malkit Singh precedent, the Court reasoned that simply identifying vending zones is insufficient; authorities must provide "workable alternatives" to avoid making relocation punitive
Source reference: para. 7The Court found that while the Petitioner was in a non-vending zone, his possession of a provisional CoV entitled him to protection from arbitrary disruption
Source reference: para. 9, 12To address safety and public order, the Court stipulated that the Petitioner’s right to vend is not absolute and must be subject to specific constraints regarding space, hygiene, and the size of the gas cylinder used for food preparation
Source reference: para. 10Holding
The Court disposed of the petition by directing the Assistant Commissioner to identify an appropriate alternative location for the Petitioner within a permitted vending area of the same zone
The Court held that until such an alternative location is allotted, the Petitioner shall not be disturbed at his current site, provided he complies with six conditions: (i) use of only small/medium gas cylinders; (ii) no encroachment on pedestrian areas; (iii) maintenance of hygiene and dustbins; (iv) compliance with CoV conditions (excluding Condition 11); (v) prohibition on sub-letting or creating third-party interests; and (vi) no permanent or temporary constructions
Source reference: para. 10, 12These directions are subject to future plans formulated by the Town Vending Committee-II
Source reference: para. 11Original Court PDF
Anuj Kumar SrivastavvsMunicipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in