Rajasthan High Court

Superior Police Officers Empowered to Order Further Investigation Prior to Filing of Police Report

TAIMOOR S/O ZUHROO B/C MEV vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Rajasthan High CourtJUDGMENT: May 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner sought to quash criminal proceedings and FIR No. 30/2019 (Sections 498A and 304B IPC) regarding the unnatural death of the deceased, Rihana.

Source reference: para. 3

Initially, the Investigating Officer (IO) found the involvement of only the husband and mother-in-law, not the petitioner.

Source reference: para. 4

Dissatisfied with this, the Superintendent of Police (SP) Alwar, vide order dated 21.02.2019, directed the Additional SP to conduct "further investigation".

Source reference: para. 4, 11

The petitioner argued that this was "re-investigation" under the guise of further investigation and that the SP lacked the authority to order it, as such power lies solely with the courts.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Superintendent of Police (SP) has the legal authority to order "further investigation" under the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) before the final police report is submitted to the Magistrate?

Source reference: para. 13
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 36 of the Cr.P.C., which empowers superior police officers to exercise the same powers as an officer-in-charge of a police station.

Source reference: para. 18

Section 173(3) and 173(8) regarding the submission of reports and the power to conduct further investigation.

Source reference: para. 17

The Court cited Nirmal Singh Kohlon v. State of Punjab [(2009) 1 SCC 441], emphasizing the right to a fair investigation under Article 21.

Source reference: para. 15

Abdul Sattar v. State of Bihar [1989 SC Online Pat 316], which established that a superior officer can direct further investigation and judicial permission is not required if the original charge-sheet has not yet been filed.

Source reference: para. 23-24
04

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that Section 36 Cr.P.C. creates a supervisory hierarchy intended to ensure the integrity of investigations by allowing superior officers, including the SP, to step into the shoes of the SHO.

Source reference: para. 19

The Court observed that at the time the SP issued the order on 21.02.2019, no charge-sheet had been filed against the co-accused, nor had a final negative report been submitted regarding the petitioner.

Source reference: para. 10

Therefore, the SP was within his statutory competence to find the initial investigation unsatisfactory and order further investigation to collect additional evidence.

Source reference: para. 11, 22

The Court clarified that while judicial permission is necessary for further investigation after a charge-sheet is submitted, no such restriction applies while the investigation is still ongoing and under the internal supervision of the police department.

Source reference: para. 24-25, 27
05

Holding

The Court held that the SP's order for further investigation was legally valid and not an unauthorized "re-investigation".

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Additional SP, Alwar (Rural), who was ordered to conduct a fair and impartial investigation in accordance with the law.

Source reference: para. 29

All interim stay orders were vacated.

Source reference: para. 30
Rajasthan High Court

Original Court PDF

TAIMOOR S/O ZUHROO B/C MEVvsSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

Rajasthan High Court · May 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment