Facts
The Petitioner, Mr. Ompal, is a street vendor selling fruit juice at Rao Tularam Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi
Source reference: p. 1-2He participated in a survey conducted by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (MCD) on July 9, 2025, and was issued an acknowledgement receipt (Survey Ref No. 9310)
Source reference: p. 2The Petitioner approached the High Court seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue a Certificate of Vending (CoV) and to protect his right to vend from the specified site without harassment
Source reference: p. 1-2Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a provisional Certificate of Vending and interim protection from displacement based on his participation in the official survey?
Source reference: p. 3, para. 7-8Law Applied
The Court applied Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which mandates the formulation of a vending plan by the Town Vending Committee (TVC)
Source reference: p. 3, para. 9The Court also relied on the principle that vendors who have been surveyed are entitled to consideration for a Certificate of Vending (CoV) and protection from arbitrary eviction during the pendency of the certification process, subject to compliance with public order and hygiene standards
Source reference: p. 3, para. 7-8Reasoning
The Court examined the Petitioner’s records, noting the undisputed fact that he successfully participated in the MCD survey conducted in July 2025
Source reference: p. 3, para. 7By linking the survey acknowledgement to the statutory protections under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, the Court reasoned that the MCD is obligated to verify these details and issue a provisional CoV in accordance with the law
Source reference: p. 3, para. 7However, the Court balanced the Petitioner's right to vend with public interest by imposing restrictive conditions to ensure that the vending activity does not obstruct pedestrian movement, create filth, or result in permanent encroachments
Source reference: p. 3, para. 8The Court further clarified that such interim protection is not an absolute vested right and remains subject to the final vending plan formulated by the TVC-II
Source reference: p. 3, para. 9Holding
The Court disposed of the petition by directing the MCD to verify the Petitioner's survey details and issue a provisional CoV
The Court held that until the CoV process is complete, the Petitioner shall not be disturbed from the vending site, provided he: (a) stays within the designated space without encroaching on pedestrian areas; (b) maintains cleanliness and uses a dustbin; and (c) refrains from erecting permanent or temporary structures
Source reference: p. 3, para. 8This order is subject to the future statutory vending plan of the TVC-II
Source reference: p. 3, para. 9Original Court PDF
OmpalvsChairman, Town Vending Committee And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in