Delhi High Court

Surveyed street vendors must be issued provisional Certificates of Vending and protected from dispossession pending finalization of vending plans.

Ompal vs Chairman, Town Vending Committee And Ors.

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: May 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Petitioner, Mr. Ompal, is a street vendor selling fruit juice at Rao Tularam Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi

Source reference: p. 1-2

He participated in a survey conducted by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (MCD) on July 9, 2025, and was issued an acknowledgement receipt (Survey Ref No. 9310)

Source reference: p. 2

The Petitioner approached the High Court seeking a direction to the Respondents to issue a Certificate of Vending (CoV) and to protect his right to vend from the specified site without harassment

Source reference: p. 1-2
02

Issues

1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a provisional Certificate of Vending and interim protection from displacement based on his participation in the official survey?

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7-8
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, which mandates the formulation of a vending plan by the Town Vending Committee (TVC)

Source reference: p. 3, para. 9

The Court also relied on the principle that vendors who have been surveyed are entitled to consideration for a Certificate of Vending (CoV) and protection from arbitrary eviction during the pendency of the certification process, subject to compliance with public order and hygiene standards

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7-8
04

Reasoning

The Court examined the Petitioner’s records, noting the undisputed fact that he successfully participated in the MCD survey conducted in July 2025

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7

By linking the survey acknowledgement to the statutory protections under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, the Court reasoned that the MCD is obligated to verify these details and issue a provisional CoV in accordance with the law

Source reference: p. 3, para. 7

However, the Court balanced the Petitioner's right to vend with public interest by imposing restrictive conditions to ensure that the vending activity does not obstruct pedestrian movement, create filth, or result in permanent encroachments

Source reference: p. 3, para. 8

The Court further clarified that such interim protection is not an absolute vested right and remains subject to the final vending plan formulated by the TVC-II

Source reference: p. 3, para. 9
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the petition by directing the MCD to verify the Petitioner's survey details and issue a provisional CoV

The Court held that until the CoV process is complete, the Petitioner shall not be disturbed from the vending site, provided he: (a) stays within the designated space without encroaching on pedestrian areas; (b) maintains cleanliness and uses a dustbin; and (c) refrains from erecting permanent or temporary structures

Source reference: p. 3, para. 8

This order is subject to the future statutory vending plan of the TVC-II

Source reference: p. 3, para. 9
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

OmpalvsChairman, Town Vending Committee And Ors.

Delhi High Court · May 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment