Facts
The appellant, represented by his GPA holder, sought withdrawal of the regular first appeal by memo.
Source reference: p.6Counsel confirmed that the decision to withdraw was conscious and that the appellant would not seek review or modification of the order.
Source reference: p.6The GPA holder had signed the memo.
Source reference: p.6Issues
Whether the appeal should be disposed of as withdrawn on the basis of the memo and the appellant’s stated conscious decision.
Source reference: p.6–7Law Applied
The appeal was filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Source reference: p.5The judgment does not discuss any substantive legal rule, precedent, or specific provision governing withdrawal; it records the Court’s acceptance of the withdrawal request.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
Counsel placed the withdrawal memo on record and confirmed that the appellant had consciously decided to withdraw the appeal.
Source reference: p.6–7The GPA holder had signed the memo, and counsel stated that the appellant would not seek review or modification of the resulting order.
Source reference: p.6–7On that basis, the Court accepted the request without examining the merits of the appeal.
Source reference: p.6–7Holding
The Court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
The Court directed that any pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
Source reference: p.7Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Code of Civil Procedure, 19081
Original Court PDF
SRI S N KRISHNA MURTHYvsSRI D VENKATEGOWDA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
