Madras High Court
Civil Procedure and EvidenceCommercial and Corporate Law

The Court permitted amendments correcting pleadings and prayers to conform to the registered sale agreement.

Shri.S.Thangappalam, vs The Official Liquidator of M/s.Achivers Agri India

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 25, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
The Court permitted amendments correcting pleadings and prayers to conform to the registered sale agreement.. Shri.S.Thangappalam, vs The Official Liquidator of M/s.Achivers Agri India. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Shri S. Thangappalam filed five applications seeking amendments to his affidavit and prayers in C.A. No. 52 of 2025, concerning a request for the Official Liquidator to execute a sale deed for land at Karandapalli Village.

Source reference: p. 1–4

The proposed corrections included survey numbers, the sale-agreement date and document number, and the stated extent of land.

Source reference: p. 1–4

The applications were heard together; the Official Liquidator was represented.

Source reference: p. 5
02

Issues

Whether the applicant should be permitted to make the requested corrections to the affidavit and prayer in C.A. No. 52 of 2025

Source reference: p. 1–4

Whether the five amendment applications should be allowed on the grounds stated in the supporting affidavits.

Source reference: p. 5
03

Law Applied

The applications invoked Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules, read with Order 9, Rules 11(b) and 63 of the Company Court Rules and the Companies Act, 1956.

Source reference: p. 1–4

The order does not identify a specific amendment test, discuss any statutory provision in detail, or cite precedent; it records that the court was satisfied with the reasons stated in the supporting affidavits.

Source reference: p. 5
04

Reasoning

The court heard both sides and considered the averments in the supporting affidavits.

Source reference: p. 5

Being satisfied with the reasons given for the proposed corrections, it allowed the applications as prayed for.

Source reference: p. 5

The order contains no further analysis of the governing rules or the merits of the underlying sale-deed request.

Source reference: p. 5
05

Holding

The court allowed COMP.A. Nos. 250 to 254 of 2026 as prayed for, permitting the requested amendments to C.A. No. 52 of 2025.

It directed the Registry to list C.P. No. 54 of 2015 after two weeks.

Source reference: p. 5
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

Shri.S.Thangappalam,vsThe Official Liquidator of M/s.Achivers Agri India

Madras High Court · September 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment