Facts
The applicant was appointed as a Teacher on December 7, 1998, and later promoted to the post of Master on substantive basis via an order dated April 23, 2013, which granted notional benefits from the date of the order and monetary benefits from the date of joining (August 3, 2013).
Source reference: p. 2The applicant claimed entitlement to his 2nd Time Bound Promotion (TBP) "In Situ" upon completing nine years of service from the date of his promotion order (i.e., May 1, 2022). However, the respondents reckoned the qualifying service from his actual date of joining (August 3, 2013), granting the TBP from September 1, 2022, instead.
Source reference: p. 2, 4This delay also resulted in the denial of an annual increment due on January 1, 2023.
Source reference: p. 3The applicant superannuated on April 30, 2023.
Source reference: p. 2Issues
1. Whether the qualifying service for the 2nd TBP "In Situ" should be reckoned from the date of the promotion order (notional benefit) or the actual date of joining the post.
Source reference: p. 8, para. 92. Whether the applicant is entitled to an annual increment effective January 1, 2023, based on the revised date of his TBP.
Source reference: p. 8, para. 9Law Applied
Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Higher Standard Pay Scale Scheme) Rules, 1996 (SRO 14 of 1996), specifically Rule 5(iv)(b), which mandates TBP after nine years of regular satisfactory service.
Source reference: p. 9, para. 10.1Rule 14 regarding interpretations by the Finance Department and a clarification by the Director Finance, School Education Department (dated April 15, 2024), which stated that "In-Situ" promotion must be reckoned from the date of notional benefits granted upon confirmation/regularization.
Source reference: p. 9-10, para. 10.2, 10.4Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2018 (SRO 193) regarding the accrual of annual increments.
Source reference: p. 6, 11Reasoning
The Tribunal found that the applicant’s substantive promotion as Master occurred on April 23, 2013, carrying notional seniority from that date.
Source reference: p. 10Relying on the Finance Department's clarification, the Tribunal reasoned that "qualifying service" for TBP is linked to the date of regularization/notional benefit rather than physical joining.
Source reference: p. 10, para. 11The court observed that similarly situated employees, such as Smt. Suman Gupta, were granted TBP by reckoning service from their promotion orders.
Source reference: p. 10Therefore, the applicant completed the requisite nine years on April 22, 2022, making him eligible for TBP from May 1, 2022.
Source reference: p. 11Consequently, since this date falls between January 2 and July 1, 2022, the applicant met the criteria under the 2018 Pay Rules to earn a statutory increment on January 1, 2023.
Source reference: p. 11, para. 12Holding
The Tribunal allowed the O.A. and quashed the impugned orders and PPO to the extent they miscalculated the TBP date.
It held that the applicant is entitled to the 2nd TBP "In Situ" effective May 1, 2022, and one annual increment effective January 1, 2023.
Source reference: p. 12, para. 13Respondents No. 1 to 3 were directed to revise the applicant's service benefits and pensionary records within six weeks, with Respondent No. 4 mandated to finalize the authorization within a further six weeks. No costs were awarded.
Source reference: p. 12, para. 13Original Court PDF
RAKESH KUMARvsSCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in