CAT - ['Jammu']

Transfer Order Challenged: Respondent Directed to Consider Representation in Accordance With Tenure-Based Transfer Policy

VISHV JYOTI vs SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Jammu']JUDGMENT: May 11, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a teacher aged 47, challenged Order No. 160-DSEJ of 2026 dated 05.05.2026, which transferred/adjusted her from her current posting at GPS Karwal, Hiranagar.

Source reference: p. 1-2

The applicant asserts she previously served over ten years in "Zone-V" (Hard Zone) and that her current posting at GPS Karwal had been specifically authorized by the Joint Director of School Education via communication dated 13.10.2025.

Source reference: p. 2

Seeking to remain at her current station, she filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Source reference: p. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the transfer order dated 05.05.2026, as it pertains to the applicant, should be quashed in light of her prior service in a Hard Zone and previous administrative authorization for her current posting.

Source reference: p. 2, para 1

2. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the applicant’s case for retention at her current place of posting in accordance with the prevailing Transfer Policy.

Source reference: p. 3, para 5
03

Law Applied

Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which grants the Tribunal jurisdiction over service matters of government employees.

Source reference: p. 2

Principles of the Administrative Transfer Policy, which governs the rotation and posting of staff based on zonal requirements (such as Hard Zones) and administrative exigencies.

Source reference: p. 3, para 5
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal examined the applicant's service history, noting her decade-long tenure in a difficult "Zone-V" area.

Source reference: p. 3

It observed that the applicant’s current posting at GPS Karwal was not arbitrary but had been issued following due consultation and approval by the Joint Director, School Education (Jammu).

Source reference: p. 2-3

The court reasoned that since the applicant’s counsel limited the prayer to a request for administrative reconsideration, a judicial review of the merits of the transfer was unnecessary at this stage. Instead, the court focused on ensuring the executive adheres to its own Transfer Policy while considering the applicant's specific service credentials and previous authorizations.

Source reference: p. 3
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application without costs and directed the respondents to consider and decide the applicant’s case regarding her continuation at GPS Karwal in accordance with the Transfer Policy within four weeks of receiving the order.

The court ordered that the interim protections previously granted on 12.03.2026 and 18.03.2026 shall remain in force, and no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant until the respondents conclude their consideration of her case.

Source reference: p. 3
CAT - ['Jammu']

Original Court PDF

VISHV JYOTIvsSCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

CAT - ['Jammu'] · May 11, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment