Facts
The applicant was arrested on January 15, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 24/2026 for allegedly transporting 36 bulk litres of handmade desi plain liquor on a motorcycle
Source reference: para. 2He was charged under Sections 34(2) and 59(A) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act
Source reference: para. 2The applicant has four criminal antecedents: one pending IPC case from 2019, two disposed cases under the Excise Act, and one case under the Gambling Act
Source reference: para. 3The prosecution opposed bail citing these antecedents and noting that the charge-sheet had already been filed
Source reference: para. 4The applicant argued that the trial would take considerable time and highlighted his period of incarceration since the date of arrest
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering his criminal history and the nature of the offense
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the power of the High Court to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1penal provisions of Sections 34(2) and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act, noting the statutory punishment ranges from one to three years
Source reference: para. 3procedural safeguards and penalties for non-compliance with bail conditions under Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The court balanced the gravity of the allegations and the applicant's criminal record against the procedural status of the case.
Source reference: no citationthe court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the applicant had been in custody for approximately two months
Source reference: para. 6The court reasoned that since the maximum punishment for the offense is three years and the conclusion of the trial is likely to be delayed, continued detention was not warranted
Source reference: para. 3, 6The court determined that the applicant's explanations for his past antecedents, coupled with the fact that the trial would take time, justified the exercise of discretionary power to grant bail, provided stringent conditions were imposed to ensure his presence during trial
Source reference: para. 6-7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties
the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments
Source reference: para. 7(i)must appear on all trial dates or face proceedings under Section 269 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 7(ii)Any violation of liberty or failure to appear following a proclamation under Section 84 of the BNSS will trigger proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 7(iii)must specifically be present for the framing of charges and recording of statements
Source reference: para. 7(iv)Original Court PDF
DILHARAN YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in