Patna High Court

Up-Pramukh cannot fix a no-confidence motion date before the Pramukh's statutory fifteen-day period expires.

Smt. Lalita Kumari vs The State of Bihar

Patna High CourtJUDGMENT: May 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, serving as the Pramukh of Panchayat Samiti, Ghoswari, was served with a requisition for a no-confidence motion by members of the Samiti on 27.02.2026

Source reference: p. 3

The Executive Officer forwarded this requisition to the petitioner on 28.02.2026

Source reference: p. 3

However, before the statutory 15-day period for the Pramukh to call a meeting had lapsed, the Up-Pramukh issued a letter on 06.03.2026 (Letter No. 65) unilaterally fixing 16.03.2026 as the date for the special meeting

Source reference: p. 3, 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Up-Pramukh has the jurisdiction to fix the date of a no-confidence motion meeting before the expiry of the 15-day period allotted to the Pramukh under the Act

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 7-9
03

Law Applied

Section 44(3) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006, which mandates that once a requisition is presented by one-third of the elected members, the Pramukh must convene a special meeting within 15 days

Source reference: p. 3-4

the legal principle established in Munni Khatun vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (2024 (4) BLJ 820 (DB)), which clarifies that the Up-Pramukh or members can only exercise the power to fix a meeting date if the Pramukh fails to do so within the prescribed statutory timeframe

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 8
04

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that under Section 44(3), the primary right and duty to schedule the special meeting rests with the Pramukh for a duration of 15 days following the requisition

Source reference: p. 4

In this case, since the petitioner received the notice on 28.02.2026, the legal window to fix the meeting extended until 15.03.2026

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 7

By issuing a notice on 06.03.2026, the Up-Pramukh "usurped" the petitioner's authority and acted in technical violation of the statutory hierarchy of power

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 9

The Court found that the Up-Pramukh’s action was premature and "in the teeth of the provisions" of the Act, rendering the meeting notice legally unsustainable

Source reference: p. 4
05

Holding

The Court allowed the writ application and quashed the Up-Pramukh’s letter dated 06.03.2026

The Court held that the fixing of the meeting by the Up-Pramukh was without jurisdiction as the petitioner's statutory time limit had not expired. Consequently, the Court directed the Pramukh (petitioner) to fix a fresh date for the no-confidence motion meeting within 15 days from the date of the judgment, as contemplated under Section 44(3) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006

Source reference: p. 5 / para. 10
Patna High Court

Original Court PDF

Smt. Lalita KumarivsThe State of Bihar

Patna High Court · May 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment