Karnataka High Court
Civil LawTransport, Maritime, and Aviation Law

Upper-limb disability is assessed at one-fourth when determining whole-body disability for compensation.

ANAND B vs PRAKASH S K

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Upper-limb disability is assessed at one-fourth when determining whole-body disability for compensation.. ANAND B vs PRAKASH S K. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained a right-clavicle fracture in a road traffic accident on 14 February 2023.

Source reference: pp. 2–4, paras. 1–4

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him ₹2,09,000 with 6% interest. He appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: pp. 2–4, paras. 1–4

The appeal was heard with the consent of counsel for the claimant and the insurer.

Source reference: p. 2, para. 2
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for loss of future income due to disability should be revised by applying the appropriate income, multiplier and disability percentage

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 6, 8

Whether the claimant was entitled to enhanced compensation under other heads, including pain and suffering, loss of amenities and loss of income during the laid-up period

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which permits an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court applied a multiplier of 16 for a claimant aged 35, adopted the 2023 notional monthly income of ₹16,250, and assessed whole-body disability at one-fourth of the 30% upper-limb disability.

Source reference: pp. 4–5, paras. 6, 8

The judgment cites no other statutory provisions or precedents.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had used a multiplier of 15 and monthly income of ₹15,000, and had assessed whole-body disability at 5%.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 6, 8

It substituted the multiplier of 16, notional income of ₹16,250 and whole-body disability of 7.5%, calculating future income loss at ₹2,34,000.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 6, 8

Given the fracture, it awarded ₹30,000 for pain and suffering and increased compensation for loss of amenities to ₹25,000.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9

It also awarded ₹32,500 for two months’ loss of income during recovery.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9

The Court otherwise retained the medical-expense award of ₹60,000 and allowed ₹4,000 collectively for attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses.

Source reference: pp. 4–6, paras. 7–9
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court assessed total compensation at ₹3,85,500, an enhancement of ₹1,76,500 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 9–10

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced amount.

Source reference: pp. 6–7, paras. 9–10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

ANAND BvsPRAKASH S K

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment