Uttarakhand High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Offline Tender Plea As Infructuous After Transport Corporation Finds Bid Technically Unqualified

SPEED TRIP SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDv.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Offline Tender Plea As Infructuous After Transport Corporation Finds Bid Technically Unqualified. SPEED TRIP SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner’s claim for acceptance and evaluation of its offline tender submission survived after the hardcopy bid was opened and evaluated pursuant to the Court’s order.

The court held

The Court held that the relief sought had ceased to survive and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.

It also directed

Any pending applications were also disposed of.

01Facts

The petitioner sought directions requiring respondent No. 2, the Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, to accept and evaluate its offline tender submission dated 5 August 2025, and to provide an alternative submission mechanism or extend the deadline.

¶ 1

By an order dated 13 August 2025, the High Court directed that the petitioner’s hardcopy technical bid be opened and examined. The tender committee subsequently evaluated it and found the petitioner technically unsuccessful; the Corporation issued a Letter of Intent to the successful bidder on 3 September 2025.

¶ 2

Respondent No. 2 submitted that the relief sought had therefore been provided and the petition had become infructuous.

¶ 2–3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner’s claim for acceptance and evaluation of its offline tender submission survived after the hardcopy bid was opened and evaluated pursuant to the Court’s order.

¶ 2–4

ii.2. Whether the writ petition remained maintainable for relief after the tender process had advanced and a Letter of Intent had been issued to the successful bidder.

¶ 2–4

03Law Applied

No statute or precedent was cited.

The Court applied the procedural principle that a petition may be dismissed as infructuous when subsequent events mean that the relief sought no longer survives.

¶ 4

04Reasoning

The petitioner had sought acceptance and evaluation of its offline bid. After the Court’s order, the hardcopy technical bid was opened and examined by the tender committee; the petitioner did not qualify at the technical-bid stage, and the Letter of Intent had been issued to another bidder.

¶ 2–3

In light of these subsequent developments, the Court concluded that the relief sought no longer survived. It did not examine the merits of the petitioner’s technical disqualification.

¶ 4

05Holding

The Court held that the relief sought had ceased to survive and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.

¶ 4–5

Any pending applications were also disposed of.

¶ 4–5
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

SPEED TRIP SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment