Uttarakhand High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceProperty and Real Estate Law

Uttarakhand HC Rejects Land-Dispute Parties’ Plea To Transfer Revision Over Threat Claims, Says They Can Seek Police Help

JAGPAL SINGH AND ORSv.RATAN SINGH

Uttarakhand HC Rejects Land-Dispute Parties’ Plea To Transfer Revision Over Threat Claims, Says They Can Seek Police Help. JAGPAL SINGH AND ORS vs RATAN SINGH. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicants’ allegations of threats and local hostility justified transferring the criminal revision from Laksar to a court outside the district.

The court held

The High Court dismissed the criminal transfer application, declining to transfer Criminal Revision No. 47 of 2026 from Laksar to a court of corresponding jurisdiction elsewhere.

It also directed

The applicants were left at liberty to seek police intervention as and when necessary.

01Facts

The applicants sought transfer under Section 447 of the BNSS of Criminal Revision No. 47 of 2026 from the Court of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Laksar, to a court of corresponding jurisdiction at Dehradun.

¶ 3

The revision arose from an order under Section 146(1) of the CrPC attaching disputed property; the revisional court had admitted the revision and stayed implementation of the attachment order.

¶ 3–6

The applicants alleged local hostility, threats, intimidation, and physical obstruction by the respondents and their associates, which they said made it unsafe to pursue the revision at Laksar.

¶ 7–9

02Issues

i.Whether the applicants’ allegations of threats and local hostility justified transferring the criminal revision from Laksar to a court outside the district.

¶ 7–9

ii.Whether the nature of the revisional proceedings provided an additional ground for transfer.

¶ 11

03Law Applied

Section 447 of the BNSS was invoked as the basis for the transfer application.

¶ 3

The underlying proceedings concerned an attachment order under Section 146(1) of the CrPC, while the applicants’ original application had been made under Section 145/146 of the CrPC.

¶ 3–5

It observed that alleged threats could be brought to the attention of the police and that the revision would be argued by counsel for the parties.

¶ 10–11

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 447

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 145Section 146

04Reasoning

The court found that the applicants’ allegations of threats did not, by themselves, establish a sufficient ground to transfer the proceedings.

¶ 10

If the applicants perceived a threat, they could report it to the police, from whom the court expected appropriate action.

¶ 10

The court also considered that the parties’ counsel would present the revision, and therefore did not regard the asserted circumstances as a ground for moving the case to another district.

¶ 11

It consequently found no good ground for transfer.

¶ 12

05Holding

The High Court dismissed the criminal transfer application, declining to transfer Criminal Revision No. 47 of 2026 from Laksar to a court of corresponding jurisdiction elsewhere.

¶ 12–13

The applicants were left at liberty to seek police intervention as and when necessary.

¶ 13
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

JAGPAL SINGH AND ORSvsRATAN SINGH

Uttarakhand High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment