Facts
The Petitioner, a street vendor holding a valid Certificate of Vending (CoV) under the category of ‘Food/Snack with gas cylinder/fire’ (URI: 6885904), sought directions against the Respondents to permit peaceful vending at Hansraj Gupta Road, Greater Kailash-I
Source reference: p. 1-2The Petitioner alleged that local police hindered his operations and seized his vending cart despite his legal status
Source reference: p. 2The matter follows similar precedents involving street vendors' rights in the South Zone of Delhi
Source reference: p. 4Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner, as a certificate-holding street vendor, is entitled to protection against harassment and the return of his seized equipment by local authorities?
Source reference: p. 2 / para. 2, 42. Whether the right to vend is subject to specific regulatory conditions regarding hygiene, space, and public passage?
Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6Law Applied
The Court applied the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, specifically Section 21, which mandates the formulation of a vending plan by the Town Vending Committee (TVC)
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6It further relied on the judicial principles established in Rajendra Singh v. Commissioner of Police and Rihana v. MCD & Ors., which balance the livelihood rights of vendors with public order, safety, and hygiene through standardized restrictive conditions
Source reference: p. 4, para. 5Reasoning
The Court observed that the Petitioner possesses a valid CoV, which prima facie entitles him to vend in the designated area
Source reference: p. 2However, the Court noted that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the public’s right to unhindered movement on footpaths
Source reference: p. 4By applying the logic from Rajendra Singh, the Court reasoned that the Petitioner could be allowed to operate provided he adheres to strict spatial limits (not encroaching on pedestrian areas), maintains a dustbin, and uses small/medium gas cylinders to minimize safety risks
Source reference: p. 4The Court emphasized that these protections are interim and subject to the future statutory vending plans developed by the Town Vending Committee-II
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6Holding
The Court disposed of the petition by directing the local police to return the Petitioner’s cart by June 2, 2026
The Petitioner is permitted to vend subject to six conditions: use of small/medium cylinders, no encroachment on pedestrian paths, mandatory maintenance of hygiene/dustbins, no sub-letting or third-party interests, no permanent construction, and compliance with all other CoV conditions except Clause 11
Source reference: p. 4-5, para. 5, 7The holding clarified that no vested rights are created, and the arrangement is subject to the Town Vending Committee's eventual statutory plan
Source reference: p. 4, para. 6Original Court PDF
Ved PrakashvsCommissioner Of Police And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in