Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Whole-body disability is assessed at one-third of limb disability when calculating future loss of income.

MANJANNA N vs LINGARAJU

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Whole-body disability is assessed at one-third of limb disability when calculating future loss of income.. MANJANNA N vs LINGARAJU. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road-traffic accident on 14 May 2023, allegedly caused by the rash and negligent driving of a motorcycle

Source reference: p.3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹3,34,000, including compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, attendant and food expenses, loss of amenities, future income loss, and conveyance charges, with interest at 6% per annum

Source reference: pp.3–4

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation for disability-related future income loss and other injury-related heads required enhancement.

Source reference: pp.4–6

2. Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for income lost during the laid-up period and for future medical expenses, and whether interest was payable on the latter.

Source reference: pp.5–7
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p.2

The Court applied the principles of assessing just compensation by considering the claimant’s age, income, functional disability, injuries, treatment and likely future medical needs; it used the multiplier method to calculate future loss of income.

Source reference: pp.4–6
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted ₹16,250 as the claimant’s notional monthly income for 2023, replacing the Tribunal’s figure of ₹15,000, and applied a multiplier of 15 based on the claimant’s age of 32.

Source reference: p.4

Having regard to the fracture and medical evidence, it assessed whole-body disability at 10% and recalculated future income loss at ₹2,92,500.

Source reference: pp.5–6

It increased compensation for loss of amenities to ₹30,000 and awarded ₹8,000 for attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses, taking account of the claimant’s eight-day hospital stay.

Source reference: p.5

It also awarded ₹32,500 for two months’ loss of income during recovery and ₹30,000 for anticipated implant-removal surgery; it declined interest on the future medical expenses.

Source reference: pp.5–7
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part. The Court enhanced the total compensation from ₹3,34,000 to ₹4,91,000, granting an additional ₹1,57,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, except on the ₹30,000 awarded for future medical expenses.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced amount.

Source reference: p.8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

MANJANNA NvsLINGARAJU

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment