Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Whole-body disability was reassessed at 16%, warranting enhanced compensation.

SHANKAR S/O. PRAKASH MUSALI vs SRIKANT S/O. MAHADEV BHAJANTRI

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Whole-body disability was reassessed at 16%, warranting enhanced compensation.. SHANKAR S/O. PRAKASH MUSALI vs SRIKANT S/O. MAHADEV BHAJANTRI. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On 6 March 2015, the appellant was injured when his motorcycle collided with a motorcycle coming from the opposite direction.

Source reference: p. 2–3

He claimed that he sustained grievous injuries, including fractures, and that the injuries affected his ability to work in agriculture and milk vending.

Source reference: p. 2–3, 5–6

The Tribunal awarded him ₹1,12,136, including ₹85,536 for permanent disability and loss of amenities, after assessing his whole-body disability at 12%.

Source reference: p. 4

The appellant appealed seeking enhancement; at the hearing, he confined his claim to the Tribunal’s assessment of disability.

Source reference: p. 5
02

Issues

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the appellant’s whole-body disability at 12% required enhancement in light of the injuries and disability evidence.

Source reference: p. 5–6

Whether the appellant was entitled to enhanced compensation for loss of income due to disability.

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p. 1

In assessing compensation for disability-related loss of income, the Court used the claimant’s annual income, the percentage of whole-body disability, and an age-based multiplier; it selected multiplier 17 for the appellant’s age and applied a 16% whole-body disability assessment.

Source reference: p. 6
04

Reasoning

The medical evidence recorded 50% disability to the upper limb and 3% to the lower limb, and the disability certificate was marked as Ex.P40.

Source reference: p. 6

Considering the appellant’s injuries, the Court found 16% whole-body disability reasonable, rather than the Tribunal’s 12%.

Source reference: p. 6

It accepted annual income of ₹40,000 and, applying multiplier 17, calculated disability-related loss of income at ₹1,08,800; the difference from the Tribunal’s ₹85,536 award under that head was ₹23,364.

Source reference: p. 6

The Court found the Tribunal’s awards under the other heads just and reasonable.

Source reference: p. 6
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced compensation by ₹23,364, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until payment.

Source reference: p. 6–7

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount and accrued interest before the Tribunal within 60 days of receiving the certified judgment, for release to the appellant upon identification.

Source reference: p. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHANKAR S/O. PRAKASH MUSALIvsSRIKANT S/O. MAHADEV BHAJANTRI

Karnataka High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment