Chhattisgarh High Court

Wife’s Convenience Predominates in Matrimonial Transfer Pleas Absent Sufficient Justification for Distant Forum Selection

PRITI SINGH RAJPUT vs AKASH SINGH RAJPUT @ KANISHK

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner (wife) and respondent (husband) were married on 11.05.2018.

Source reference: para. 2

Following allegations of cruelty and dowry harassment, the petitioner began residing at Raigarh, where she is employed at a private hospital.

Source reference: para. 2

The respondent, a resident of District Korba, instituted a divorce petition under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, before the District & Additional Sessions Court, Gharghoda, District Raigarh.

Source reference: para. 2–3

The petitioner filed this transfer petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), seeking to transfer the proceedings to the Family Court, Raigarh, citing travel hardships and the distance from her residence.

Source reference: para. 1–2
02

Issues

1. Whether Civil Suit No. A/14/2025 should be transferred from the District & Additional Sessions Court, Gharghoda to the Family Court, Raigarh, based on the convenience of the wife in matrimonial proceedings.

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the general power of transfer and withdrawal of suits.

Source reference: para. 6

In matrimonial disputes, the wife’s convenience is a primary consideration for transfer as established in N.C.V. Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik (2022 SCC Online SC 1199).

Source reference: para. 6

Interdependent proceedings between the same parties should be tried by the same judge to avoid a multiplicity of trials and conflicting decisions.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court evaluated the petitioner’s circumstance as a working woman residing in Raigarh and found that travelling to the Gharghoda court caused her severe hardship.

Source reference: para. 2, 7

The respondent’s justification for filing in Gharghoda—that the petitioner previously worked there—was contested by the petitioner and ultimately found insufficient by the Court to override her current residential convenience.

Source reference: para. 3–4, 7

Applying the "wife’s convenience" doctrine from N.C.V. Aishwarya, the Court determined that the ends of justice necessitated the transfer to Raigarh to ensure the petitioner could effectively participate in the proceedings.

Source reference: para. 6–7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the transfer petition, answering that the convenience of the petitioner (wife) outweighs the respondent's venue choice.

It ordered the transfer of Civil Suit No. A/14/2025 from the District & Additional Sessions Court, Gharghoda, to the Family Court, Raigarh, C.G., for trial and disposal in accordance with the law.

Source reference: para. 8

Both parties were directed to appear before the Family Court, Raigarh, on 16.06.2026.

Source reference: para. 9
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PRITI SINGH RAJPUTvsAKASH SINGH RAJPUT @ KANISHK

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment