Chhattisgarh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Women’s SHG’s Fair-Price Shop Suspension Challenge Sent To Authority; Chhattisgarh HC Keeps Interim Protection Until Decision

MAHILA SELF-HELP GROUP CHAULv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Women’s SHG’s Fair-Price Shop Suspension Challenge Sent To Authority; Chhattisgarh HC Keeps Interim Protection Until Decision. MAHILA SELF-HELP GROUP CHAUL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner should be relegated to the remedy available before the competent authority under the Control Order, 2016 rather than have the suspension order adjudicated in the writ petition.

The court held

The writ petition was finally disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority within 30 days of receiving the Court’s order.

It also directed

The authority was directed to decide the matter on its merits within a further 30 days, after providing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

The interim protection granted on 23 November 2022 was to continue until the proceedings before that authority were finally decided.

01Facts

The petitioner, a women’s self-help group allotted Fair Price Shop No. 532005051 on 31 March 2022, challenged the Sub-Divisional Officer’s order dated 3 November 2022 suspending the shop.

¶ 2

The suspension followed an inspection, a show-cause notice, and the petitioner’s reply. The petitioner alleged that the reply was not considered and that the order was passed without a proper inquiry.

¶ 2

The State submitted that a statutory procedure was available under the Chhattisgarh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner should be relegated to the remedy available before the competent authority under the Control Order, 2016 rather than have the suspension order adjudicated in the writ petition.

¶ 4, 6

ii.2. Whether the interim protection granted by the Court should continue while the competent authority considers the matter.

¶ 7

03Law Applied

The Court relied on the Chhattisgarh Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, under which a detailed procedure was available before the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)-cum-Prescribed Authority for considering the dispute concerning the Fair Price Shop suspension.

¶ 4, 6

The Court did not identify or apply any particular provision of the Control Order or cite any precedent.

04Reasoning

Because the petitioner challenged a Fair Price Shop suspension for which the Control Order, 2016 provided a procedure before the competent authority, the Court considered it appropriate to direct the petitioner to pursue that remedy.

¶ 6

It did not determine the petitioner’s allegations concerning the merits of the suspension; instead, it directed the authority to decide the matter in accordance with law after affording a hearing.

¶ 6, 8

05Holding

The writ petition was finally disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority within 30 days of receiving the Court’s order.

¶ 6, 8

The authority was directed to decide the matter on its merits within a further 30 days, after providing the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

¶ 6, 8

The interim protection granted on 23 November 2022 was to continue until the proceedings before that authority were finally decided.

¶ 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

MAHILA SELF-HELP GROUP CHAULvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment