01Facts
The petitioner sought a direction to count his work-charged service when calculating qualifying service for pension, as had allegedly been done for other employees
¶ 4He submitted that the issue was covered by the Uttarakhand High Court’s decision dated 9 March 2018 in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*, which had been upheld in a dismissed special appeal, and by later decisions concerning similarly situated employees
¶ 5The State respondents did not dispute those submissions.
¶ 602Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioner’s work-charged service should be reckoned for computation of qualifying service for pension in accordance with the judgment in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*
¶ 4–7ii.2. Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the petitioner’s claim within a specified period
¶ 803Law Applied
The Court applied the principle established by its Coordinate Bench in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018* (judgment dated 9 March 2018), which the petitioner cited as governing the reckoning of work-charged service for pension purposes; the Court also noted that a special appeal against that judgment had been dismissed.
¶ 5No statute or further legal test was identified in the order.
04Reasoning
The Court accepted that the petitioner’s claim was covered by the Coordinate Bench judgment and noted that the respondents did not dispute the cited position.
¶ 5–6It therefore disposed of the petition in accordance with that judgment, without independently restating or analysing its underlying legal reasoning.
¶ 705Holding
The petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 9 March 2018 in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*.
¶ 7Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to decide the petitioner’s claim strictly in light of that judgment, within one month of production of a certified copy of the order.
¶ 8Original Court PDF
RAMESHWAR PRASAD SAINIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
