Uttarakhand High CourtSocial Security and PensionsAdministrative and Public Law

Work-Charged Service Pension Claim: Uttarakhand HC Gives Officials One Month to Decide It Under 2018 Ruling

RAMESHWAR PRASAD SAINIv.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Work-Charged Service Pension Claim: Uttarakhand HC Gives Officials One Month to Decide It Under 2018 Ruling. RAMESHWAR PRASAD SAINI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND. Uttarakhand High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner’s work-charged service should be reckoned for computation of qualifying service for pension in accordance with the judgment in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*

The court held

The petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 9 March 2018 in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*.

It also directed

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to decide the petitioner’s claim strictly in light of that judgment, within one month of production of a certified copy of the order.

01Facts

The petitioner sought a direction to count his work-charged service when calculating qualifying service for pension, as had allegedly been done for other employees

¶ 4

He submitted that the issue was covered by the Uttarakhand High Court’s decision dated 9 March 2018 in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*, which had been upheld in a dismissed special appeal, and by later decisions concerning similarly situated employees

¶ 5

The State respondents did not dispute those submissions.

¶ 6

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner’s work-charged service should be reckoned for computation of qualifying service for pension in accordance with the judgment in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*

¶ 4–7

ii.2. Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the petitioner’s claim within a specified period

¶ 8

03Law Applied

The Court applied the principle established by its Coordinate Bench in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018* (judgment dated 9 March 2018), which the petitioner cited as governing the reckoning of work-charged service for pension purposes; the Court also noted that a special appeal against that judgment had been dismissed.

¶ 5

No statute or further legal test was identified in the order.

04Reasoning

The Court accepted that the petitioner’s claim was covered by the Coordinate Bench judgment and noted that the respondents did not dispute the cited position.

¶ 5–6

It therefore disposed of the petition in accordance with that judgment, without independently restating or analysing its underlying legal reasoning.

¶ 7

05Holding

The petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 9 March 2018 in *WPSS No. 401 of 2018*.

¶ 7

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were directed to decide the petitioner’s claim strictly in light of that judgment, within one month of production of a certified copy of the order.

¶ 8
Uttarakhand High Court

Original Court PDF

RAMESHWAR PRASAD SAINIvsSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Uttarakhand High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment