01Facts
On 3 April 2021, the claimant, then aged 17 and a student, was riding a bicycle when a bus belonging to the respondent Transport Corporation struck her from behind.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 2–6The Tribunal found the bus driver negligent and awarded ₹74,097, including ₹25,000 for 5% disability calculated at ₹5,000 per percentage, alongside amounts for pain and suffering, nourishment, medical bills and other expenses.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 2–6The claimant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation.
p. 1 · p. 3 · ¶ 702Issues
i.Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹5,000 per percentage of disability was inadequate and required enhancement.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11ii.Whether the amounts awarded for pain and suffering and nourishment were inadequate and required enhancement.
p. 5 · ¶ 1103Law Applied
The appeal was brought under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
p. 1The Court applied the percentage method to assess disability because the Medical Board certificate did not identify any functional disability; it considered the amount payable per percentage in light of the accident’s 2021 date and inflation.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court left undisturbed the Tribunal’s finding of negligence and focused on quantum.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11As the Medical Board assessed 5% disability but did not specify functional disability, the Tribunal had properly used the percentage method; however, ₹5,000 per percentage was inadequate given the accident occurred in 2021.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11The Court therefore increased the rate to ₹9,000 per percentage, awarding ₹45,000 for disability.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11It also found the awards for pain and suffering and nourishment inadequate and increased them to ₹25,000 and ₹10,000 respectively, while affirming the remaining heads as just and proper.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 1105Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 12The total compensation was enhanced from ₹74,097 to ₹1,14,097, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the claim-petition filing date until deposit.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 12The respondent was directed to deposit the amount, less any sum already deposited, within six weeks.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 12The claimant was not entitled to interest for the 446-day delay period, as previously ordered; the Tribunal’s other directions remained unchanged.
pp. 5–6 · ¶ 12Original Court PDF
S.DIVYAvsTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
