01Facts
On 5 September 2010, Balakrishnan was riding a two-wheeler with his two brothers when it collided with a State Transport Corporation bus.
¶ 3–8All three riders died.
¶ 3–8The claimants—Balakrishnan’s wife, children and parents—challenged the Tribunal’s award, which attributed 50% contributory negligence to Balakrishnan because the two-wheeler carried three persons.
¶ 3–8The Tribunal awarded Rs. 33,13,000 before the deduction for contributory negligence, resulting in an award of Rs. 16,56,500.
¶ 1802Issues
i.1. Whether triple riding, contrary to Section 128 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, justified attributing 50% contributory negligence to the deceased.
¶ 12–15ii.2. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income and other compensation heads warranted interference.
¶ 9, 11, 16–1803Law Applied
Section 128 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, restricts the number of persons who may be carried on a two-wheeler.
¶ 12–13However, as held in Mohammed Siddique v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., (2020) 3 SCC 57, breach of that restriction does not, by itself, establish contributory negligence; a causal connection between the breach and the accident or its consequences must be shown.
¶ 12–13The appeal was brought under Section 173 of the Act.
Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173Section 128
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 279Section 337
04Reasoning
The Court accepted that carrying three persons violated Section 128, but held that the violation alone could not sustain the Tribunal’s 50% deduction.
¶ 14–15Having regard to the evidence, including the claim that the bus was driven at speed and on the wrong side, the Court considered the bus driver’s negligence predominant while finding some contributory role on the deceased’s part.
¶ 14–15It therefore reallocated negligence as 75% to the bus driver and 25% to the deceased.
¶ 14–15The Court found no reason to disturb the Tribunal’s assessment of income, multiplier or deduction for personal expenses, but increased funeral expenses and consortium and awarded transport expenses.
¶ 16–1805Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
¶ 18–23The Court modified the negligence apportionment to 75% against the bus driver and 25% against the deceased, and revised the gross compensation to Rs. 34,38,000.
¶ 18–23After deducting 25% for contributory negligence, the claimants were held entitled to Rs. 25,78,500, enhancing the Tribunal’s award from Rs. 16,56,500.
¶ 18–23The respondent was directed to deposit the enhanced amount, less any amount already deposited, with interest at 7.5% per annum from the claim-petition date; directions were also made concerning withdrawal and the minors’ shares.
¶ 18–23Original Court PDF
B. Usha alias Usha Devi,vsThe Managing Director,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
