01Facts
Yash, aged seven, died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 21 February 2024.
¶ 2–5His parents filed a claim petition, which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panipat allowed, assessing his monthly income at Rs.18,500.81 and awarding Rs.29,47,000 with interest at 6% per annum.
¶ 2–5The insurer appealed, contending that the applicable minimum wage for a skilled worker was Rs.12,646.12 per month.
¶ 7–8The claimants did not dispute that figure but argued that the higher Deputy Commissioner (DC) rate should be used.
¶ 7–802Issues
i.Whether the deceased child’s income for calculating compensation should be assessed by reference to the minimum wage for a skilled worker applicable at the time of the accident.
¶ 7, 10–11ii.Whether DC rates should be used instead of the statutory minimum wage to assess the child’s income.
¶ 8, 12–1303Law Applied
For a minor who dies or suffers permanent disability in a motor vehicle accident, the child should not be treated as a non-earning individual merely because they were not employed; income for calculating compensation should be assessed, at minimum, by reference to the wages payable to a skilled worker under the applicable State notification.
¶ 11DC rates do not have the statutory basis or sanction of rates fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and may vary according to local factors; they are generally applicable to Government institutions and establishments and cannot be applied as a general measure of income in motor accident claims.
¶ 12Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 279
04Reasoning
The Tribunal had assessed Yash’s income at Rs.18,500.81, but the applicable Haryana notification fixed the minimum monthly wage for a skilled worker at Rs.12,646.12.
¶ 5, 10Applying the rule for minors, the Court adopted the notified skilled-worker wage, rounded to Rs.12,646 per month.
¶ 11, 14It rejected the claimants’ reliance on DC rates because those rates lacked a statutory basis and were not a general measure for calculating income in motor accident claims.
¶ 12–13On the revised income, the Court applied 40% future prospects, a 50% deduction for personal and living expenses, and a multiplier of 18, then added the conventional heads of compensation.
¶ 1405Holding
The Court allowed the insurer’s appeal and modified the award, reducing the compensation from Rs.29,47,000 to Rs.20,45,168, payable equally to the parents, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition until realization.
¶ 14–15The insurer, driver, and owner were directed to deposit the modified amount jointly and severally within two months; the Tribunal was directed to disburse it to the claimants.
¶ 16–18Original Court PDF
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. LtdvsMukesh And Others
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
