Punjab and Haryana High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Parents And Siblings Of 21-Year-Old Killed By School Bus Get Consortium As P&H HC Raises Total Compensation To ₹22.44 Lakh

Fateena And Othersv.Ahmed Hasan And Others

Parents And Siblings Of 21-Year-Old Killed By School Bus Get Consortium As P&H HC Raises Total Compensation To ₹22.44 Lakh. Fateena And Others vs Ahmed Hasan And Others. Punjab and Haryana High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the deceased’s income should be assessed using the applicable minimum wage for an unskilled worker in District Nuh, rather than the Tribunal’s estimate of Rs.9,000 per month

The court held

The appeal was allowed and the award modified. The Court reassessed total compensation at Rs.22,44,962, an enhancement of Rs.8,07,162 over the Tribunal’s award

It also directed

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with the Tribunal within two months.

Claimants Nos. 3 and 4 were each to receive Rs.44,000; claimant No. 3’s share was to be kept in a fixed deposit until attaining majority. The balance was to be disbursed to the parents as apportioned by the Tribunal

01Facts

On 16 February 2022, Lukman, aged 21, was struck and fatally injured by a school bus while standing beside a motorcycle stopped at the roadside

pp. 1–2 · ¶ 2, 15

His parents, brother and sister sought compensation.

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.14,37,800, assessing Lukman’s monthly income at Rs.9,000 and awarding Rs.44,000 for loss of consortium; it allocated compensation to the parents but not the siblings

pp. 2–3 · ¶ 5–6

The claimants appealed, seeking reassessment of income by reference to Haryana’s minimum wage and consortium for each claimant

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 7–9

02Issues

i.1. Whether the deceased’s income should be assessed using the applicable minimum wage for an unskilled worker in District Nuh, rather than the Tribunal’s estimate of Rs.9,000 per month

pp. 4–5 · ¶ 8, 12

ii.2. Whether each claimant, including the deceased’s siblings, was entitled to compensation for loss of consortium

pp. 5–6 · ¶ 9, 13–14

03Law Applied

Where documentary evidence of a deceased person’s income is unavailable, the applicable State minimum wage for an unskilled worker in the relevant district on the date of the accident is to be considered when assessing income

pp. 4–5 · ¶ 12

In Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram, the Supreme Court recognised spousal, parental and filial consortium, including a parent’s entitlement to filial consortium on the death of a child

pp. 5–6 · ¶ 14

The judgment also applied the compensation-assessment factors set out in its calculation, including future prospects, deduction for personal expenses, multiplier, and conventional sums for loss of estate and funeral expenses

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 15

04Reasoning

The Tribunal had assessed income at Rs.9,000 per month without documentary support. Since the applicable minimum wage in District Nuh on the accident date was Rs.10,098.88, the Court rounded it to Rs.10,099 and recalculated dependency using 40% future prospects, a one-third deduction for personal expenses and a multiplier of 18

pp. 4–5 · pp. 6–7 · ¶ 12, 15

Applying Magma General Insurance, the Court held that consortium was available to all the claimants and included Rs.44,000 for each of the four claimants

pp. 5–7 · ¶ 13–15

05Holding

The appeal was allowed and the award modified. The Court reassessed total compensation at Rs.22,44,962, an enhancement of Rs.8,07,162 over the Tribunal’s award

pp. 6–7 · ¶ 15

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with the Tribunal within two months.

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 16–18

Claimants Nos. 3 and 4 were each to receive Rs.44,000; claimant No. 3’s share was to be kept in a fixed deposit until attaining majority. The balance was to be disbursed to the parents as apportioned by the Tribunal

pp. 7–8 · ¶ 16–18
Punjab and Haryana High Court

Original Court PDF

Fateena And OthersvsAhmed Hasan And Others

Punjab and Haryana High Court · October 31, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment