Gujarat High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

A Magistrate cannot issue process for rape when the complaint contains no such allegation.

DURGESH BHERULAL PALIVAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
A Magistrate cannot issue process for rape when the complaint contains no such allegation.. DURGESH BHERULAL PALIVAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The complainant filed a private complaint concerning alleged extra-marital relationships between his wife and several men, including the applicant.

Source reference: no citation

After examining the complainant, the Magistrate directed an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On considering the inquiry report and statements, the Magistrate issued process against the applicant and others under Sections 497 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by order dated 19 April 2018. The applicant sought quashing of the complaint and process order under Section 482 CrPC

Source reference: pp. 1–2, 4

The High Court noted that the complaint contained no averment alleging an offence under Section 376 IPC.

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

Whether the Magistrate could issue process against the applicant under Section 497 IPC after that provision had been declared unconstitutional

Source reference: para. 5.2

Whether the Magistrate exceeded jurisdiction by issuing process under Section 376 IPC when that offence had not been alleged in the complaint

Source reference: paras. 5, 5.3
03

Law Applied

Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court’s inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Section 202(1) CrPC permits a Magistrate, after receiving a complaint, to direct an inquiry to determine whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed; the inquiry does not, on the reasoning in this judgment, justify taking cognizance of an offence unsupported by allegations in the complaint.

Source reference: p. 4

In Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39, the Supreme Court declared Section 497 IPC unconstitutional.

Source reference: para. 3.2; para. 5.2
04

Reasoning

The Court found no allegation in the complaint supporting an offence under Section 376 IPC. It held that the Magistrate should not have travelled beyond the complaint to issue process for that offence, particularly where the allegations concerned the wife’s alleged extra-marital relationships and the wife herself had made no such allegation against the applicant.

Source reference: pp. 4–5

As to Section 497 IPC, the Court relied on Joseph Shine and held that the process order, which included that offence, could not stand.

Source reference: para. 5.2

It therefore granted relief under Section 482 CrPC.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The application was allowed.

The complaint in Criminal Case No. 22497 of 2018 and the Magistrate’s order dated 19 April 2018 were quashed and set aside qua the applicant; the Rule was made absolute.

Source reference: para. 6
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732

Indian Penal Code, 18602

Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

DURGESH BHERULAL PALIVALvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment