Facts
The complainant filed a private complaint concerning alleged extra-marital relationships between his wife and several men, including the applicant.
Source reference: no citationAfter examining the complainant, the Magistrate directed an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On considering the inquiry report and statements, the Magistrate issued process against the applicant and others under Sections 497 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by order dated 19 April 2018. The applicant sought quashing of the complaint and process order under Section 482 CrPC
Source reference: pp. 1–2, 4The High Court noted that the complaint contained no averment alleging an offence under Section 376 IPC.
Source reference: p. 4Issues
Whether the Magistrate could issue process against the applicant under Section 497 IPC after that provision had been declared unconstitutional
Source reference: para. 5.2Whether the Magistrate exceeded jurisdiction by issuing process under Section 376 IPC when that offence had not been alleged in the complaint
Source reference: paras. 5, 5.3Law Applied
Section 482 CrPC preserves the High Court’s inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice. Section 202(1) CrPC permits a Magistrate, after receiving a complaint, to direct an inquiry to determine whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed; the inquiry does not, on the reasoning in this judgment, justify taking cognizance of an offence unsupported by allegations in the complaint.
Source reference: p. 4In Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39, the Supreme Court declared Section 497 IPC unconstitutional.
Source reference: para. 3.2; para. 5.2Reasoning
The Court found no allegation in the complaint supporting an offence under Section 376 IPC. It held that the Magistrate should not have travelled beyond the complaint to issue process for that offence, particularly where the allegations concerned the wife’s alleged extra-marital relationships and the wife herself had made no such allegation against the applicant.
Source reference: pp. 4–5As to Section 497 IPC, the Court relied on Joseph Shine and held that the process order, which included that offence, could not stand.
Source reference: para. 5.2It therefore granted relief under Section 482 CrPC.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The application was allowed.
The complaint in Criminal Case No. 22497 of 2018 and the Magistrate’s order dated 19 April 2018 were quashed and set aside qua the applicant; the Rule was made absolute.
Source reference: para. 6Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732
Indian Penal Code, 18602
Original Court PDF
DURGESH BHERULAL PALIVALvsSTATE OF GUJARAT
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
