Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Accused In Alleged 3,000-Tablet Nitrazepam Case Gets Bail As Chhattisgarh HC Notes Tablets Were Seized From Co-Accused’s Car

RAJ DASv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Accused In Alleged 3,000-Tablet Nitrazepam Case Gets Bail As Chhattisgarh HC Notes Tablets Were Seized From Co-Accused’s Car. RAJ DAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 BNSS in the circumstances of the case, including the seizure from a car owned by a co-accused and the absence of criminal antecedents.

The court held

The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on a ₹25,000 bond with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions concerning attendance, adjournments, and presence at specified trial stages.

It also directed

The order also set out consequences for specified defaults and directed that a certified copy be sent to the trial court.

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act.

¶ 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant and two co-accused were apprehended with approximately 3,000 Nitrazepam tablets, weighing 1.68 kg, found in a plastic bag in a car.

¶ 1–4

The applicant’s first bail application had been withdrawn with liberty to revive it after examination of seizure witnesses.

¶ 1–4

In the second application, the applicant relied, among other things, on the examination of two witnesses who were declared hostile, the fact that the car belonged to a co-accused, and the absence of criminal antecedents.

¶ 1–4

The State confirmed that the tablets were seized from the co-accused’s car and did not dispute the absence of antecedents.

¶ 1–4

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 BNSS in the circumstances of the case, including the seizure from a car owned by a co-accused and the absence of criminal antecedents.

¶ 3–6

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides the basis for the High Court’s consideration of an application for regular bail.

¶ 1

The alleged offence was punishable under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act.

¶ 1

The order does not cite or discuss any precedent or set out a separate test under the NDPS Act; it records that bail was granted on consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶ 6

Provisions in the judgment · 6 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483Section 84Section 351

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 22

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 269Section 209

04Reasoning

The Court considered the parties’ submissions and the documents accompanying the application.

¶ 4–6

It noted that the alleged tablets had been seized from a car owned by a co-accused, rather than from the applicant’s exclusive possession, and that the applicant had no criminal antecedents.

¶ 4–6

On those circumstances, and without expressing any view on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail.

¶ 4–6

05Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on a ₹25,000 bond with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions concerning attendance, adjournments, and presence at specified trial stages.

¶ 7–8

The order also set out consequences for specified defaults and directed that a certified copy be sent to the trial court.

¶ 7–8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAJ DASvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment