Facts
The three applicants, Safai Karamcharis in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s Education Department, sought arrears of pay arising from their regularisation and MACP benefits.
Source reference: no citationTheir regularisation orders took effect from 1 April 2015 for Applicants 1 and 3, and 1 April 2007 for Applicant 2
Source reference: p.5The respondents’ counter-reply set out pay-fixation and MACP arrears for each applicant, stated that the bills had been passed, and confirmed that payment remained pending
Source reference: p.6The respondents attributed the non-payment to paucity of funds and undertook to pay when funds became available
Source reference: pp.5–6The applicants also sought condonation of delay under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Source reference: p.3Issues
1. Whether the delay in filing the O.A. should be condoned where the claims concerned recurring non-payment of salary and MACP arrears
Source reference: pp.3–42. Whether the applicants were entitled to directions requiring payment of the admitted pay-fixation and MACP arrears, with interest if payment was delayed
Source reference: pp.5–7Law Applied
Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, governs limitation for applications before the Tribunal and permits delay to be condoned.
Source reference: no citationRelying on M.R. Gupta v. Union of India, 1995 SCC (5) 628, and Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, (2008) 8 SCC 648, the Tribunal treated the claims concerning non-payment of salary and benefits as recurring causes of action, with a fresh cause arising each month
Source reference: p.4The Tribunal also directed that unpaid arrears would carry interest at the rate applicable to General Provident Fund deposits, from the date of entitlement until payment
Source reference: p.7Reasoning
The Tribunal considered the applicants’ claims to relate to recurring monthly non-payment of salary and MACP benefits and, applying the principles in M.R. Gupta and Tarsem Singh, condoned the delay in filing the O.A.
Source reference: pp.3–4On the merits, the respondents’ calculation charts showed that the arrears had been calculated and the bills passed but remained unpaid; the respondents also acknowledged the amounts were due, attributing the delay to lack of funds.
Source reference: pp.5–7The Tribunal therefore directed payment within a fixed period and provided for interest if that deadline was not met.
Source reference: p.7Holding
The Tribunal allowed the delay-condonation application and the O.A.
It directed the respondents to pay all pay-fixation and MACP arrears due to the applicants within eight weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order.
Source reference: p.7If payment was not made within that period, the arrears would carry interest at the rate applicable to General Provident Fund deposits, from the date of entitlement until actual payment.
Source reference: p.7No order as to costs was made
Source reference: p.7Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
OMVATI AND ORSvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Admitted salary and MACP arrears must be paid within eight weeks, with GPF-rate interest for delay.. OMVATI AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/admitted-salary-and-macp-arrears-must-be-paid-within-eight-weeks-with-gpf-rate-interest-fo-992a1e61a0874b5e88c99e1fbd021f74.webp)