CAT - ['Delhi']
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Admitted salary and MACP arrears must be paid within eight weeks, with GPF-rate interest for delay.

OMVATI AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: October 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Admitted salary and MACP arrears must be paid within eight weeks, with GPF-rate interest for delay.. OMVATI AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The three applicants, Safai Karamcharis in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi’s Education Department, sought arrears of pay arising from their regularisation and MACP benefits.

Source reference: no citation

Their regularisation orders took effect from 1 April 2015 for Applicants 1 and 3, and 1 April 2007 for Applicant 2

Source reference: p.5

The respondents’ counter-reply set out pay-fixation and MACP arrears for each applicant, stated that the bills had been passed, and confirmed that payment remained pending

Source reference: p.6

The respondents attributed the non-payment to paucity of funds and undertook to pay when funds became available

Source reference: pp.5–6

The applicants also sought condonation of delay under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Source reference: p.3
02

Issues

1. Whether the delay in filing the O.A. should be condoned where the claims concerned recurring non-payment of salary and MACP arrears

Source reference: pp.3–4

2. Whether the applicants were entitled to directions requiring payment of the admitted pay-fixation and MACP arrears, with interest if payment was delayed

Source reference: pp.5–7
03

Law Applied

Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, governs limitation for applications before the Tribunal and permits delay to be condoned.

Source reference: no citation

Relying on M.R. Gupta v. Union of India, 1995 SCC (5) 628, and Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, (2008) 8 SCC 648, the Tribunal treated the claims concerning non-payment of salary and benefits as recurring causes of action, with a fresh cause arising each month

Source reference: p.4

The Tribunal also directed that unpaid arrears would carry interest at the rate applicable to General Provident Fund deposits, from the date of entitlement until payment

Source reference: p.7
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal considered the applicants’ claims to relate to recurring monthly non-payment of salary and MACP benefits and, applying the principles in M.R. Gupta and Tarsem Singh, condoned the delay in filing the O.A.

Source reference: pp.3–4

On the merits, the respondents’ calculation charts showed that the arrears had been calculated and the bills passed but remained unpaid; the respondents also acknowledged the amounts were due, attributing the delay to lack of funds.

Source reference: pp.5–7

The Tribunal therefore directed payment within a fixed period and provided for interest if that deadline was not met.

Source reference: p.7
05

Holding

The Tribunal allowed the delay-condonation application and the O.A.

It directed the respondents to pay all pay-fixation and MACP arrears due to the applicants within eight weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order.

Source reference: p.7

If payment was not made within that period, the arrears would carry interest at the rate applicable to General Provident Fund deposits, from the date of entitlement until actual payment.

Source reference: p.7

No order as to costs was made

Source reference: p.7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851

CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

OMVATI AND ORSvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - ['Delhi'] · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment