01Facts
The appellants brought this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21 July 2016 passed by the District Judge, Balodabazar, in Civil Appeal No. 38A/2015.
¶ 1At the hearing, appellants’ counsel informed the High Court that the parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court and that no cause of action survived.
¶ 202Issues
i.Whether the parties’ out-of-court settlement rendered the second appeal infructuous.
¶ 2ii.Whether the appeal should therefore be dismissed.
¶ 303Law Applied
The judgment cites no statute, precedent, or substantive legal doctrine. The Court proceeded on appellants’ counsel’s submission that the parties had settled the dispute and no cause of action survived.
¶ 204Reasoning
In light of the reported settlement and the submission that no cause of action remained, the Court found that the appeal no longer required adjudication on its merits.
¶ 2–3It accordingly treated the appeal as infructuous.
¶ 2–305Holding
The High Court dismissed the second appeal as infructuous because the parties had settled the dispute out of court.
¶ 3The High Court dismissed the second appeal as infructuous because the parties had settled the dispute out of court.
¶ 3Original Court PDF
Agunmati KanwarvsRamratan Kanwar
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
