01Facts
The applicant, a Municipal Corporation of Delhi employee, superannuated on 30 June 2020.
pp. 2–4By the time the application was heard, the respondents had paid several terminal benefits, including commuted pension, gratuity, leave encashment, GPF, GIS and 7th CPC arrears; some payments were made in 2024.
pp. 2–4The applicant’s counsel stated that the remaining claims concerned MACP arrears and bonus.
pp. 2–4The applicant also sought interest on delayed retirement benefits.
pp. 2–402Issues
i.1. Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the applicant’s claims for MACP benefits and bonus.
p. 3ii.2. Whether the applicant was entitled to arrears and interest on delayed retirement-benefit payments.
pp. 2–403Law Applied
The application was brought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which provides for applications to the Tribunal concerning service matters.
pp. 2–4The Tribunal relied on the Full Bench decision in Rajbir Singh v. MCD & Ors., O.A. No. 2821/2023, decided on 30 October 2025, as the basis for the applicant’s entitlement to arrears and interest on delayed payments; the judgment does not set out the Full Bench’s specific test or prescribe a rate of interest.
pp. 2–4Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19
04Reasoning
Since the applicant’s counsel accepted that most terminal benefits had been paid and identified MACP arrears and bonus as the surviving claims, the Tribunal directed the respondents to consider those claims under the applicable rules.
pp. 3–4It also noted that the applicant had retired in 2020 but certain benefits were released only in 2024, and applied the Full Bench’s ruling to recognise entitlement to arrears and interest on delayed payments.
pp. 3–405Holding
The Tribunal disposed of the application, directing the respondents to consider the applicant’s claim for MACP benefits and bonus in accordance with the applicable rules within three months of receiving a certified copy of the order.
pp. 3–4It further held that the applicant was entitled to arrears and interest on delayed payments in terms of Rajbir Singh.
pp. 3–4Pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of, with no order as to costs.
pp. 3–4Original Court PDF
BALWAN SINGHvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![After Some MCD Retirement Dues Came 4 Years Late, CAT Says Interest Is Due and Orders MACP, Bonus Claims Considered. BALWAN SINGH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/after-some-mcd-retirement-dues-came-4-years-late-cat-says-interest-is-due-and-orders-macp-d3dbea3aed82480cb6025795e86be947.webp)