Chhattisgarh High Court
Property and Real Estate LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

An appeal under the 2011 Act is maintainable when eviction was adjudicated under that Act.

PRATAP L. JESRANI vs SMT. KRISHNA BAI THAVAIT (Died and Deleted) Ajay Kumar Thavait

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: September 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
An appeal under the 2011 Act is maintainable when eviction was adjudicated under that Act.. PRATAP L. JESRANI vs SMT. KRISHNA BAI THAVAIT (Died and Deleted) Ajay Kumar Thavait. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The original landlord filed an eviction application on 21 December 2015 under the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act, 1961.

Source reference: para. 3

Although the Rent Control Authority recorded that the application had been filed under that Act, it considered the matter under the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, noting that the statutory precondition of three months’ prior notice had been met, and ordered eviction on 25 September 2023.

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The tenant’s appeal under Section 13 of the 2011 Act was dismissed as not maintainable because the application had been filed under the 1961 Act; the Tribunal later dismissed the tenant’s review petition as well.

Source reference: para. 3, 7–8

The tenant challenged both Tribunal orders before the High Court.

Source reference: no citation
02

Issues

1. Whether an appeal under Section 13 of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 was maintainable where the eviction application was filed under the 1961 Act but decided under the 2011 Act.

Source reference: para. 6–8

2. Whether the Tribunal’s dismissal of the appeal as not maintainable should be set aside and the appeal remitted for decision on its merits.

Source reference: para. 8
03

Law Applied

The Court considered the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 and the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, including Section 13 of the 2011 Act.

Source reference: para. 6–8

It held that the nomenclature of a petition is not determinative; adjudication should turn on the subject matter and relief claimed.

Source reference: para. 6–8

Where an eviction application, despite being filed under the 1961 Act, is decided under the 2011 Act, an appeal under Section 13 of the 2011 Act is maintainable.

Source reference: para. 6–8
04

Reasoning

The Rent Control Authority had considered the application under the 2011 Act and ordered eviction after finding that its preconditions, including prior notice, were satisfied.

Source reference: para. 6–8

The Tribunal therefore erred in treating the application’s reference to the 1961 Act as decisive and dismissing the appeal without addressing its merits.

Source reference: para. 6–8

The High Court set aside the Tribunal’s appeal and review orders and remitted the appeal for fresh adjudication.

Source reference: para. 6–8
05

Holding

The High Court held that the appeal under Section 13 of the 2011 Act was maintainable, set aside the Tribunal’s orders dated 27 June 2024 and 30 January 2026, and remitted Appeal No. 78-A of 2023 to the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Tribunal for decision on its merits after hearing the parties.

The parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal on 12 October 2026; the writ petition was allowed to that extent and the interim order was vacated.

Source reference: para. 9–10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 20111

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PRATAP L. JESRANIvsSMT. KRISHNA BAI THAVAIT (Died and Deleted) Ajay Kumar Thavait

Chhattisgarh High Court · September 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment