Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Anticipatory bail denied where alleged sexual relations continued on a marriage promise after the applicant married another woman.

MOHIT SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 13, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Anticipatory bail denied where alleged sexual relations continued on a marriage promise after the applicant married another woman.. MOHIT SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The prosecutrix alleged that she met the applicant through Instagram and that, beginning in February 2025, he established physical relations with her on promises of marriage.

Source reference: para. 2

She further alleged that he continued the relationship after marrying another woman in 2026, and later refused to marry her.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 195/2026, registered for offences under Section 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita / Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Source reference: para. 1

He asserted that the relationship was consensual and that he had no other criminal antecedents; the State opposed bail, relying on the allegations and his subsequent marriage.

Source reference: paras. 3–4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with the registered offences.

Source reference: paras. 1, 6

2. Whether the allegations, including the applicant’s alleged continuation of physical relations on a promise of marriage after marrying another woman, warranted refusal of anticipatory bail.

Source reference: paras. 4, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, provides the statutory basis for an application seeking anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court considered the nature of the allegations and the circumstances of the case when deciding whether to grant that relief.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the parties’ submissions and the documents accompanying the application.

Source reference: para. 5

Although the applicant characterized the relationship as consensual and pointed to his lack of criminal antecedents, the Court gave weight to the allegation that he married another woman in 2026 and thereafter continued physical relations with the prosecutrix on the promise of marriage.

Source reference: paras. 3, 6

Having regard to the overall circumstances and the nature of the allegations, it found the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court answered the anticipatory-bail issue against the applicant.

The Court dismissed his application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023.

Source reference: para. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

4 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232

Indian Penal Code, 18601

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

MOHIT SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment