Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Anticipatory bail granted to accused allegedly threatening to expose cooperative-bank irregularities.

PURUSHOTTAM PUROHIT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 07, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Anticipatory bail granted to accused allegedly threatening to expose cooperative-bank irregularities.. PURUSHOTTAM PUROHIT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 262/2026, registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The prosecution alleged that the applicant threatened the deceased during a phone call on 25 December 2025, and that the deceased was found hanging the next day.

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant denied the allegation and submitted that the deceased’s suicide was connected to a co-accused’s failure to return ₹52,00,000; the State opposed bail but confirmed that the applicant had no other criminal antecedents.

Source reference: paras. 3–4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged offence under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS

Source reference: paras. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The application was made under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, which provides for anticipatory bail. The alleged offences were under Sections 108 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

Source reference: para. 1

The Court stated no specific precedent or further legal test; it determined the application having regard to the facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations, and the parties’ submissions.

Source reference: para. 6
04

Reasoning

Having considered the circumstances and the nature of the allegations, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Source reference: para. 6

It imposed conditions requiring the applicant to remain available for interrogation, refrain from influencing persons acquainted with the case or prejudicing a fair trial, and attend court on each date fixed.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The Court allowed the application.

The Court directed that, in the event of arrest in the specified crime, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions.

Source reference: para. 7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

3 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PURUSHOTTAM PUROHITvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 07, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment