Madhya Pradesh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawConstitutional Law

Ashoknagar Collector Undertakes To Build Lawyers’ Room In Six Months; MP HC Directs Separate Bar Room With Basic Amenities For Women Lawyers

District Bar Association Ashoknagar Through Its President Shri Chandra Shekhar Sahuv.The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Ashoknagar Collector Undertakes To Build Lawyers’ Room In Six Months; MP HC Directs Separate Bar Room With Basic Amenities For Women Lawyers. District Bar Association Ashoknagar Through Its President Shri  Chandra Shekhar Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petition could be disposed of on the basis of the Collector’s undertaking to construct permanent sitting space for lawyers practising at Tehsil Ashoknagar within six months.

The court held

The petition was finally disposed of on the Collector’s undertaking to complete permanent sitting space for lawyers practising in Tehsil Ashoknagar within six months.

It also directed

The respondents were also directed to provide a separate Bar room with basic amenities for female lawyers.

01Facts

The District Bar Association filed a petition under Article 226 seeking, among other reliefs, a suitable space and basic facilities for advocates practising before the Tehsil and Circle Courts at Ashoknagar, following the courts’ move to a newly inaugurated building.

¶ 1

The Collector initially resisted providing space, and the Court passed various orders during the proceedings.

¶ 2

On 29 October 2026, the Collector filed an affidavit undertaking to construct a permanent, “pakka” sitting space for advocates within six months.

¶ 2–5

The Association stated that this undertaking addressed its primary concern and did not oppose disposal of the petition on that basis.

¶ 2–5

02Issues

i.Whether the petition could be disposed of on the basis of the Collector’s undertaking to construct permanent sitting space for lawyers practising at Tehsil Ashoknagar within six months.

¶ 2–4

ii.Whether the construction should include a separate Bar room with basic amenities for female lawyers, consistently with the Supreme Court’s direction in Sarika Tyagi v. Union of India.

¶ 6

03Law Applied

Article 226 of the Constitution empowers the High Court to issue writs and directions, including to address the relief sought in this petition.

¶ 1

The Court also applied the Supreme Court’s direction in Sarika Tyagi v. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 770/2026, order dated 26 October 2026, that a separate room with basic amenities be provided for female lawyers irrespective of their number in the court concerned.

¶ 6

04Reasoning

The Collector’s sworn undertaking committed the respondents to completing permanent sitting space for lawyers within six months, and the Association accepted that undertaking as meeting its primary objective.

¶ 2–5

The Court therefore disposed of the petition on that basis.

¶ 2–5

It additionally required the respondents to account for the Supreme Court’s direction by providing a separate Bar room with basic amenities for female lawyers as part of the construction.

¶ 6

05Holding

The petition was finally disposed of on the Collector’s undertaking to complete permanent sitting space for lawyers practising in Tehsil Ashoknagar within six months.

¶ 5, 7

The respondents were also directed to provide a separate Bar room with basic amenities for female lawyers.

¶ 6
Madhya Pradesh High Court

Original Court PDF

District Bar Association Ashoknagar Through Its President Shri Chandra Shekhar SahuvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment