Karnataka High CourtProperty and Real Estate LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Bennethora Project Claimants Agree To ₹1.23 Lakh/Acre For Dry Land; Karnataka HC Directs Compensation Paid Without TDS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERv.THE STATE AND ORS

Bennethora Project Claimants Agree To ₹1.23 Lakh/Acre For Dry Land; Karnataka HC Directs Compensation Paid Without TDS. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER vs THE STATE  AND  ORS. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the parties’ mediated settlement should be accepted and given effect to in substitution of the existing land-acquisition award.

The court held

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the Mediation Agreement, which was made part of the order and declared a lawful settlement substituting any award, judgment or decree of the Reference or Appellate Court.

It also directed

The Court directed that payments be made without TDS and that the concerned courts draw up a decree consistent with the agreement within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

01Facts

The petitioner, the beneficiary of the land acquisition, challenged the judgment and award dated 19 April 2017 passed by the First Appellate Court in LAC No. 643 of 2016. It was undisputed that the petitioner had not been impleaded before that court.

p. 3

During the writ proceedings, the parties participated in mediation and filed a Memorandum of Mediation Agreement, approved by the State Government, settling the claim at ₹1,22,982 per acre for dry land, subject to specified terms concerning statutory benefits, interest, payment and full and final settlement. The claimants also raised an apprehension about tax deducted at source (TDS) on the compensation.

pp. 4–7

02Issues

i.1. Whether the parties’ mediated settlement should be accepted and given effect to in substitution of the existing land-acquisition award.

pp. 3–5, 7–9

ii.2. Whether payments made under the settlement should be subject to TDS.

p. 7

03Law Applied

The Court treated the mediated settlement as a lawful settlement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, and directed that it operate in substitution of any award, judgment or decree passed by the Reference Court or Appellate Court.

p. 8

On TDS, the Court relied on its earlier order dated 20 August 2025 in W.P. No. 102884 of 2025, which held that compensation for compulsory acquisition of land was not subject to deduction of tax at source under the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act.

p. 8

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 89

04Reasoning

The Court accepted the settlement after noting that it had been voluntarily reached through mediation and that the authorized Land Acquisition Officer had signed the agreement.

pp. 4–7

Rather than determine the merits of the challenge to the appellate award, the Court gave effect to the parties’ agreed terms under Section 89 and Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, directing that the settlement replace the prior award or decree. Applying its earlier decision on TDS, the Court directed that settlement payments be made without deduction at source.

p. 8

05Holding

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the Mediation Agreement, which was made part of the order and declared a lawful settlement substituting any award, judgment or decree of the Reference or Appellate Court.

pp. 8–9

The Court directed that payments be made without TDS and that the concerned courts draw up a decree consistent with the agreement within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order.

pp. 8–9
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERvsTHE STATE AND ORS

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment