Karnataka High CourtProperty and Real Estate LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Karnataka HC Approves KNNL-Landowner Settlement At ₹50,820/Acre For Dry Land, With 3.5-Year Interest Waiver Conditional On Payment Within Four Months

KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMv.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

Karnataka HC Approves KNNL-Landowner Settlement At ₹50,820/Acre For Dry Land, With 3.5-Year Interest Waiver Conditional On Payment Within Four Months. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA  AND  ORS. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the mediation settlement could be accepted despite the Deputy Commissioner not having signed it

The court held

The agreement was accepted as a lawful settlement, and all payments under it were directed to be made without TDS

It also directed

The concerned courts were directed to draw up a decree in accordance with the agreement within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the mediation agreement

01Facts

Karnataka Neeravari Nigam (KNNL), the beneficiary of a land acquisition, challenged an appellate judgment and award on the ground that it had not been made a party before the First Appellate Court

p. 2

The parties were referred to mediation and filed a settlement agreement fixing the market value of dry land at ₹50,820 per acre, providing for statutory benefits subject to specified exclusions and waivers of interest, and recording other terms of full and final settlement

pp. 3–6

The Deputy Commissioner had not signed the agreement, but the authorized Land Acquisition Officer had

p. 7

The claimants also raised a concern about tax deducted at source (TDS) on the compensation

p. 7

02Issues

i.1. Whether the mediation settlement could be accepted despite the Deputy Commissioner not having signed it

p. 7

ii.2. Whether payments made under the settlement should be made without deduction of TDS

pp. 7–8

iii.3. Whether the settlement should be recorded as a lawful compromise and form the basis for the decree in place of the existing award or judgment

p. 8

03Law Applied

Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order XXIII Rule 3, permits a mediated settlement to be recorded as a lawful compromise; where accepted, the settlement may be made the basis of a decree

p. 8

The Court also relied on its earlier order dated 20 August 2025 in W.P. No. 102884/2025, which held that compensation for compulsory acquisition of land was not subject to TDS under the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act

p. 8

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 89

04Reasoning

The Court accepted the settlement because the dispute was principally between KNNL, as beneficiary, and the landholder, the State had consented to it in principle, and the authorized Land Acquisition Officer had signed it; accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner’s signature was dispensed with

p. 7

Following its earlier TDS ruling, the Court directed that payments under the agreement be made without TDS

p. 8

It then treated the agreement as a lawful settlement under Section 89 and Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, in substitution for the prior award, judgment, or decree

p. 8

05Holding

The agreement was accepted as a lawful settlement, and all payments under it were directed to be made without TDS

pp. 7–8

The concerned courts were directed to draw up a decree in accordance with the agreement within 60 days of receiving a certified copy of the order

p. 8

The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the mediation agreement

p. 9
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment