CAT - ['Hyderabad']
Administrative and Public LawEmployment and Labour Law

Candidates lacking prescribed disability certificates cannot claim PwBD reservation in GDS recruitment.

Nalla Mahender vs POST TELANGANA CIRCLE

CAT - ['Hyderabad']JUDGMENT: October 09, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Candidates lacking prescribed disability certificates cannot claim PwBD reservation in GDS recruitment.. Nalla Mahender vs POST TELANGANA CIRCLE. CAT - ['Hyderabad']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, who stated that he belonged to the OBC category, applied for Gramin Dak Sevak (GDS) posts in Hyderabad City Division under the July 2026 recruitment notification.

Source reference: p. 2

He relied on surgery for pilonidal sinus and claimed resulting physical limitations, seeking consideration under the PwBD/medical-grounds quota and, if necessary, assessment by a Government Medical Board.

Source reference: p. 3

The respondents submitted that he had not produced a prescribed disability certificate, no PwBD vacancy had been notified in the division, and he had applied under the OBC category.

Source reference: p. 4

The Tribunal dismissed the OA at the admission stage.

Source reference: p. 5
02

Issues

Whether the applicant could be considered for a PwBD vacancy without producing a valid disability certificate in the prescribed format.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

Whether the applicant could claim consideration against a PwBD vacancy when no such vacancy had been notified for the relevant GDS engagement in Hyderabad City Division.

Source reference: p. 4
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied Reservation Clause 6 of the recruitment notification, which required candidates claiming SC/ST/OBC/PwBD/EWS reservation to be entitled to the benefit under the notification and to possess a valid certificate in the prescribed format.

Source reference: p. 3

It also referred to Clause 6(h)(iii), Note 2, concerning specified spinal or locomotor disabilities, and Note 1, concerning assignment of selected candidates with physical restrictions to non-delivery or stationery work, as relied upon by the applicant.

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal identified no statute or judicial precedent as the basis of its decision.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant had not furnished the prescribed disability certificate required by Clause 6 and therefore could not establish entitlement to PwBD reservation.

Source reference: p. 4

It also accepted the respondents’ submission that no PwBD vacancy had been notified for the relevant engagement in Hyderabad City Division.

Source reference: p. 4

The applicant’s medical history and claimed physical limitations did not, in the absence of the required certificate and an available notified vacancy, establish a basis for the requested consideration.

Source reference: pp. 3–4
05

Holding

The Tribunal held that the OA was devoid of merit and dismissed it at the admission stage.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were also dismissed, with no order as to costs.

Source reference: p. 5
CAT - ['Hyderabad']

Original Court PDF

Nalla MahendervsPOST TELANGANA CIRCLE

CAT - ['Hyderabad'] · October 09, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment