01Facts
The Union of India and other original respondents sought an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal’s common order dated 17 April 2026 in OA 310/00957/2023 and connected matters.
p. 5 · ¶ 2They also sought condonation of a 23-day delay in filing the extension application. The Tribunal considered both applications.
p. 5 · ¶ 1–202Issues
i.Whether the 23-day delay in filing the application for extension of time should be condoned.
p. 5 · ¶ 1ii.Whether the applicants should receive an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal’s order dated 17 April 2026.
p. 5 · ¶ 2–303Law Applied
The order cites no statute, precedent, or specific legal test.
p. 5 · ¶ 1, 3The Tribunal applied its discretion on the basis of the reasons stated in the applications and the interests of justice when deciding whether to condone the delay and grant additional time.
p. 5 · ¶ 1, 304Reasoning
The Tribunal accepted the reasons advanced for the 23-day delay and found that condonation was warranted in the interests of justice.
p. 5 · ¶ 1On the extension request, it considered the applicants’ stated reasons sufficient to grant additional time, but limited the extension to two months from the date of the order and ruled out any further extension.
p. 5 · ¶ 305Holding
The Tribunal allowed MA 310/00566/2026, condoning the 23-day delay.
p. 5 · ¶ 1It granted MA 310/00567/2026 in part by allowing two months from 14 October 2026 to comply with the order dated 17 April 2026, with no further extension; the extension application was disposed of, with no order as to costs.
p. 5 · ¶ 1, 3–4Original Court PDF
N ARIRAMAKRISHNANvsM/O FINANCE AND 2 OLTHERS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![CAT Gives Centre Two Months To Comply With Order, Bars Any Further Extension. N ARIRAMAKRISHNAN vs M/O FINANCE AND 2 OLTHERS. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/cat-gives-centre-two-months-to-comply-with-order-bars-any-further-extension-ef25eb814fbc41e1a5cd30ec352f7810.webp)