CAT - ['Chennai']Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

CAT Gives Centre Two Months To Comply With Order, Bars Any Further Extension

N ARIRAMAKRISHNANv.M/O FINANCE AND 2 OLTHERS

CAT Gives Centre Two Months To Comply With Order, Bars Any Further Extension. N ARIRAMAKRISHNAN vs M/O FINANCE AND 2 OLTHERS. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the 23-day delay in filing the application for extension of time should be condoned.

The court held

The Tribunal allowed MA 310/00566/2026, condoning the 23-day delay.

It also directed

It granted MA 310/00567/2026 in part by allowing two months from 14 October 2026 to comply with the order dated 17 April 2026, with no further extension; the extension application was disposed of, with no order as to costs.

01Facts

The Union of India and other original respondents sought an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal’s common order dated 17 April 2026 in OA 310/00957/2023 and connected matters.

p. 5 · ¶ 2

They also sought condonation of a 23-day delay in filing the extension application. The Tribunal considered both applications.

p. 5 · ¶ 1–2

02Issues

i.Whether the 23-day delay in filing the application for extension of time should be condoned.

p. 5 · ¶ 1

ii.Whether the applicants should receive an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal’s order dated 17 April 2026.

p. 5 · ¶ 2–3

03Law Applied

The order cites no statute, precedent, or specific legal test.

p. 5 · ¶ 1, 3

The Tribunal applied its discretion on the basis of the reasons stated in the applications and the interests of justice when deciding whether to condone the delay and grant additional time.

p. 5 · ¶ 1, 3

04Reasoning

The Tribunal accepted the reasons advanced for the 23-day delay and found that condonation was warranted in the interests of justice.

p. 5 · ¶ 1

On the extension request, it considered the applicants’ stated reasons sufficient to grant additional time, but limited the extension to two months from the date of the order and ruled out any further extension.

p. 5 · ¶ 3

05Holding

The Tribunal allowed MA 310/00566/2026, condoning the 23-day delay.

p. 5 · ¶ 1

It granted MA 310/00567/2026 in part by allowing two months from 14 October 2026 to comply with the order dated 17 April 2026, with no further extension; the extension application was disposed of, with no order as to costs.

p. 5 · ¶ 1, 3–4
CAT - ['Chennai']

Original Court PDF

N ARIRAMAKRISHNANvsM/O FINANCE AND 2 OLTHERS

CAT - ['Chennai'] · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment