01Facts
The applicant, a Scheduled Caste candidate, was provisionally appointed as GDS Branch Postmaster with effect from 13 September 2010 and regularised with effect from 28 March 2014.
¶ 2She applied to sit the LGO Residual Vacancy Examination for Postal Assistant/Sorting Assistant posts. The Department rejected her application for failure to meet the five-year service requirement.
¶ 2After an interim order permitted her to take the examination, with her result to be kept in a sealed cover, she challenged the rejection before the Tribunal.
¶ 11The notification required five years of continuous GDS service by the relevant crucial date; for the 2019 vacancy year, that date was 1 January 2019.
¶ 13–1402Issues
i.Whether the applicant satisfied the five-year service requirement for eligibility to sit the examination, having regard to the relevant crucial date and the date from which her service was counted.
¶ 12–16ii.Whether the rejection of her application was unlawful or otherwise warranted interference by the Tribunal.
¶ 16–1803Law Applied
The examination notification required GDS candidates to have completed five years of continuous service as of the crucial date applicable to the relevant vacancy year.
¶ 13–14The Tribunal accepted that, for this eligibility assessment, the applicant’s service was reckoned from her regular appointment on 28 March 2014, rather than her provisional appointment in 2010.
¶ 15–16The Tribunal also held that Scheduled Caste status did not dispense with the prescribed minimum service requirement.
¶ 17The judgment identifies no statutory provision or named precedent as the basis of its decision; it notes a similar issue considered in Anjumol P.R.V. v. Department of Posts, OA No. 618/2020, without further discussion.
¶ 1704Reasoning
The Tribunal relied on the applicant’s regularisation date of 28 March 2014 and the notification’s crucial dates to find that she had not completed five years of regular service by 1 January 2019, the crucial date for the 2019 vacancy year.
¶ 15–16It therefore accepted the Department’s conclusion that she failed the service requirement for the vacancies covered by the notification.
¶ 15–16The Tribunal rejected her reliance on her earlier provisional service and her Scheduled Caste status as grounds to excuse that requirement.
¶ 1705Holding
The Tribunal held that the applicant did not meet the prescribed five-year service condition and found no valid ground to interfere with the rejection order dated 10 September 2019.
¶ 18The Original Application was dismissed, with no order as to costs.
¶ 18Original Court PDF
SUGANYA DvsM/o Communications
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![GDS Worker Had Under Five Years’ Regular Service At Cut-Off: CAT Upholds Postal Assistant Exam Rejection. SUGANYA D vs M/o Communications. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/gds-worker-had-under-five-years-regular-service-at-cut-off-cat-upholds-postal-assistant-ex-826713968bfd4d858aa7a755b26fc333.webp)