CAT - ['Delhi']Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

CAT Orders Fresh Height Measurement For Constable Applicant Claiming ST Status After 154.6 Cm Reading Differs From 155 Cm Government Certificate

lalita meenav.HOME AFFAIRS

CAT Orders Fresh Height Measurement For Constable Applicant Claiming ST Status After 154.6 Cm Reading Differs From 155 Cm Government Certificate. lalita meena vs HOME AFFAIRS. CAT - ['Delhi']. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the discrepancy between the PE&MT measurement and the subsequent Government medical certificate warranted a fresh, independent measurement of the applicant’s height.

The court held

The Original Application was disposed of with directions to preserve the original PE&MT records and arrange a fresh measurement by a Medical/Physical Measurement Board at a Government hospital, after notice to the applicant.

It also directed

The measurement must be conducted digitally and manually, with both results recorded.

If the applicant establishes her ST status, the respondents must consider the applicable 2 cm relaxation and thereafter assess her candidature under the relevant eligibility rules and merit position.

The exercise was to be completed, as far as practicable, within four weeks of receipt of the certified order; no automatic right to appointment was granted, and there was no order as to costs.

01Facts

The applicant challenged her exclusion from the Delhi Police Constable (Executive) Female Examination, 2025, after her height was recorded as 154.6 cm at the PE&MT on 20 August 2026.

¶ 1–4

She asserted that she belonged to the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category, had completed the endurance events, and obtained a Government medical certificate two days later recording her height as 155 cm.

¶ 1–4

The respondents maintained that the PE&MT measurement was conducted under the prescribed procedure and that the subsequent certificate did not displace it.

¶ 5

02Issues

i.Whether the discrepancy between the PE&MT measurement and the subsequent Government medical certificate warranted a fresh, independent measurement of the applicant’s height.

¶ 7–8

ii.Whether the applicant’s candidature should be reconsidered under the applicable height standard and any ST relaxation, without conferring an automatic right to appointment.

¶ 8–9

03Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the recruitment standard stated in the order: a minimum height of 157 cm for female candidates, with a 2 cm relaxation for ST candidates, subject to the applicable recruitment rules and examination notice.

¶ 7, 11

It treated a disputed physical measurement as capable of objective verification and directed an independent measurement to ensure that eligibility was assessed accurately; such verification does not itself amount to relaxation of the prescribed standard.

¶ 8

No statute or precedent was identified as the basis of the Tribunal’s decision.

04Reasoning

The Tribunal found a specific discrepancy between the recorded height of 154.6 cm and the subsequent Government certificate recording 155 cm.

¶ 7–8

Because height is objectively measurable, it considered an independent measurement appropriate to resolve the dispute, without deciding the applicant’s ultimate eligibility or granting any relaxation.

¶ 7–8

It therefore directed a duly constituted Board at a Government hospital to measure the applicant both digitally and manually, and required the respondents to consider the resulting measurement, the applicant’s ST status, the applicable rules, and her merit position.

¶ 9

05Holding

The Original Application was disposed of with directions to preserve the original PE&MT records and arrange a fresh measurement by a Medical/Physical Measurement Board at a Government hospital, after notice to the applicant.

¶ 9–12

The measurement must be conducted digitally and manually, with both results recorded.

¶ 9–12

If the applicant establishes her ST status, the respondents must consider the applicable 2 cm relaxation and thereafter assess her candidature under the relevant eligibility rules and merit position.

¶ 9–12

The exercise was to be completed, as far as practicable, within four weeks of receipt of the certified order; no automatic right to appointment was granted, and there was no order as to costs.

¶ 9–12
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

lalita meenavsHOME AFFAIRS

CAT - ['Delhi'] · October 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment