Chhattisgarh High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceAdministrative and Public Law

Chhattisgarh HC Gives Gujarat Pharmacy One Month To Refile Tender Challenge Withdrawn After Technical Bid Opened

M/S PETLAD MAHAL AROGYA MANDAL PHARMACYv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Gives Gujarat Pharmacy One Month To Refile Tender Challenge Withdrawn After Technical Bid Opened. M/S PETLAD MAHAL AROGYA MANDAL PHARMACY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.

The court held

The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

It also directed

The petitioner was permitted, if so advised, to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within one month.

The Court made no determination on the merits of the tender or rate-contract claims.

01Facts

The petitioner sought relief concerning a State-approved extension of its rate contracts for eight items and challenged the evaluation process in a tender for Ayurvedic medicines, including the treatment of competing bidders’ technical bids.

¶ 2

The petitioner submitted that, after filing the petition, the tender’s technical bid had been opened and sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.

¶ 3

The State and the other appearing respondents did not oppose the request.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.

¶ 3

ii.2. Whether the tender-related claims and requested reliefs required adjudication in the present petition.

¶ 3–5

03Law Applied

The judgment cites no statute, precedent, or substantive legal doctrine.

¶ 3–5

The Court acted on the petitioner’s request to withdraw the petition and the respondents’ lack of objection, permitting a fresh petition with better particulars within the stated period.

¶ 3–5

04Reasoning

The Court did not examine the merits of the petitioner’s claims concerning the rate contracts or tender evaluation.

¶ 3–5

In light of the intervening opening of the technical bid, the petitioner sought withdrawal to bring a fresh petition with better particulars; as the appearing respondents raised no objection, the Court allowed withdrawal and granted limited liberty to refile.

¶ 3–5

05Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

¶ 5

The petitioner was permitted, if so advised, to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within one month.

¶ 5

The Court made no determination on the merits of the tender or rate-contract claims.

¶ 3–5
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

M/S PETLAD MAHAL AROGYA MANDAL PHARMACYvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment