01Facts
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 179/2026, registered for offences under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
p. 1The complainant alleged that the applicant secretly recorded her while she was changing clothes in 2025, threatened to circulate the video, and later obtained sexual relations from her under that threat at a lodge in Bhanupratappur; she reported the matter on 2 September 2026.
p. 2The applicant denied the allegations, asserted that the complainant had consented, and submitted that he had no criminal antecedents. The State and the objector opposed bail.
p. 302Issues
i.Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 179/2026.
p. 1, 3ii.Whether anticipatory bail should be made subject to conditions concerning cooperation with the investigation, non-interference with witnesses or the proceedings, and attendance at trial.
p. 403Law Applied
The application was brought under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which provides the procedural basis for seeking anticipatory bail.
p. 1The alleged offences were under Sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
pp. 1–2The Court cited no precedent or further legal test; it stated that it had considered the facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations, and the parties’ submissions, without expressing an opinion on the merits.
p. 3Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64Section 351
04Reasoning
The Court heard the competing submissions, including the applicant’s claim of consent and the objector’s assertion that intercourse was forced.
p. 3It did not make findings on those disputed allegations or explain their relative weight. Having considered the circumstances and the nature of the allegations, it concluded that the applicant should receive anticipatory bail, while imposing conditions requiring cooperation with the investigation and attendance at trial, and prohibiting interference with witnesses or the fairness of the proceedings.
pp. 3–405Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed that, in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like sum, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.
p. 4The applicant must attend interrogation when required, must not induce, threaten, or promise anything to persons acquainted with the case’s facts, must not prejudice a fair and expeditious trial, and must appear before the trial Court on each date fixed until the trial’s disposal.
p. 4Original Court PDF
VIVEK BODALEvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
