Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Man Accused In Theft Of 1,995 Kg Of Power-Line Wire

LOKESH NAGv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Man Accused In Theft Of 1,995 Kg Of Power-Line Wire. LOKESH NAG vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances of the case.

The court held

The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court.

It also directed

The Court imposed conditions concerning adjournments, attendance, and personal appearance at specified stages of trial; it also directed that a certified copy of the order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in a case registered under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

p. 1

The prosecution alleged that a drum containing approximately 1,995 kg of ACSR Panther conductor wire, valued at ₹3.5 lakh, was stolen from a transmission-line project site.

p. 2

During investigation, a co-accused allegedly disclosed that he and the applicant had stolen conductor wire and concealed it at a complex in Govindpur.

pp. 2–3

The applicant submitted that he was implicated on the basis of the co-accused’s statement, had been in custody since 25 July 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed.

p. 3

He also relied on the grant of bail to a co-accused.

p. 3

The State opposed bail, citing the applicant’s alleged involvement in two similar offences, but did not dispute the co-accused’s release on bail.

p. 3

02Issues

i.1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances of the case.

pp. 1, 3–4

ii.2. Whether the applicant’s custody, filing of the charge-sheet, the expected duration of trial, and the co-accused’s grant of bail supported release on bail.

pp. 3–4

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the BNSS empowers the High Court to grant regular bail.

p. 1

In exercising that power, the Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, and the parties’ submissions.

p. 4

The alleged offences were under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

p. 1

Provisions in the judgment · 7 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483Section 84Section 351

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303Section 3Section 269Section 209

04Reasoning

The Court considered the nature of the allegations alongside the applicant’s submissions that the accusation rested on a co-accused’s statement, that he had been in custody since 25 July 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed and trial might take time.

pp. 3–4

It also noted the State’s position concerning the alleged similar offences and the undisputed fact that a co-accused had been granted bail.

p. 3

On the stated circumstances, and without expressing an opinion on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail.

p. 4

05Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court.

p. 4

The Court imposed conditions concerning adjournments, attendance, and personal appearance at specified stages of trial; it also directed that a certified copy of the order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.

pp. 3–4
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

LOKESH NAGvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment