01Facts
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in a case registered under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
p. 1The prosecution alleged that a drum containing approximately 1,995 kg of ACSR Panther conductor wire, valued at ₹3.5 lakh, was stolen from a transmission-line project site.
p. 2During investigation, a co-accused allegedly disclosed that he and the applicant had stolen conductor wire and concealed it at a complex in Govindpur.
pp. 2–3The applicant submitted that he was implicated on the basis of the co-accused’s statement, had been in custody since 25 July 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed.
p. 3He also relied on the grant of bail to a co-accused.
p. 3The State opposed bail, citing the applicant’s alleged involvement in two similar offences, but did not dispute the co-accused’s release on bail.
p. 302Issues
i.1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances of the case.
pp. 1, 3–4ii.2. Whether the applicant’s custody, filing of the charge-sheet, the expected duration of trial, and the co-accused’s grant of bail supported release on bail.
pp. 3–403Law Applied
Section 483 of the BNSS empowers the High Court to grant regular bail.
p. 1In exercising that power, the Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, and the parties’ submissions.
p. 4The alleged offences were under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
p. 1Provisions in the judgment · 7 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483Section 84Section 351
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303Section 3Section 269Section 209
04Reasoning
The Court considered the nature of the allegations alongside the applicant’s submissions that the accusation rested on a co-accused’s statement, that he had been in custody since 25 July 2026, and that the charge-sheet had been filed and trial might take time.
pp. 3–4It also noted the State’s position concerning the alleged similar offences and the undisputed fact that a co-accused had been granted bail.
p. 3On the stated circumstances, and without expressing an opinion on the merits, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail.
p. 405Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court.
p. 4The Court imposed conditions concerning adjournments, attendance, and personal appearance at specified stages of trial; it also directed that a certified copy of the order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.
pp. 3–4Original Court PDF
LOKESH NAGvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
