Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Chhattisgarh HC Rejects Parents’ Fresh-Probe Plea Over Son’s Fatal Motorcycle Crash, Noting Wife’s Statement Amid Family Dispute

WAHAB KHANv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Rejects Parents’ Fresh-Probe Plea Over Son’s Fatal Motorcycle Crash, Noting Wife’s Statement Amid Family Dispute. WAHAB KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the alleged discrepancies and investigative shortcomings warranted the High Court’s interference under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

The court held

The Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition, finding no sufficient ground for interference under Section 528 BNSS.

It also directed

The requested reliefs, including quashing the charge-sheet and directing further investigation, were not granted.

01Facts

The case arose from a fatal road accident on 1 March 2025, in which Rahmatullah Khan was allegedly struck by a motorcycle and later died at AIIMS, Raipur.

¶ 2

A case under Section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was registered against the motorcycle’s driver, and a charge-sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur.

¶ 2

The deceased’s parents and other family members sought, among other reliefs, quashing of the charge-sheet and further investigation, alleging discrepancies in the time and circumstances of the incident and deficiencies in the investigation, including the failure to record the petitioners’ statements.

¶ 1, 3

The State opposed the petition, contending that the alleged defects could not be examined in this proceeding and could be addressed in appropriate Motor Vehicles Act claim proceedings.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the alleged discrepancies and investigative shortcomings warranted the High Court’s interference under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 3–4, 7

ii.2. Whether the petitioners were entitled to quashing of the charge-sheet or a direction for further investigation.

¶ 1, 3, 7

03Law Applied

The Court considered its jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in deciding whether interference was warranted.

¶ 7

The alleged offence was registered under Section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 2

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 106

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the statement of the deceased’s wife had been recorded during the investigation and that an inter se family dispute existed between the petitioners and the wife.

¶ 6

Having considered the material on record, the Court found no sufficient ground to interfere under Section 528 BNSS; it therefore declined the requested relief despite the petitioners’ allegations concerning discrepancies and the investigation.

¶ 3, 7

05Holding

The Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition, finding no sufficient ground for interference under Section 528 BNSS.

¶ 7

The requested reliefs, including quashing the charge-sheet and directing further investigation, were not granted.

¶ 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

WAHAB KHANvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment