Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Timber-Smuggling Accused Gets Anticipatory Bail As Chhattisgarh HC Cites Co-Accused’s Statement And Seizure From Truck, Not His Premises

HIMANSHU RATHIv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Timber-Smuggling Accused Gets Anticipatory Bail As Chhattisgarh HC Cites Co-Accused’s Statement And Seizure From Truck, Not His Premises. HIMANSHU RATHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in the circumstances of the case, including his implication through a co-accused’s memorandum statement and the seizure of the wood from a vehicle in a forest area.

The court held

The Court allowed the application and directed that, if arrested in connection with the specified crime, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount.

It also directed

The applicant must be available for interrogation when required, must not threaten or induce persons acquainted with the case, must not prejudice a fair and expeditious trial, and must attend each trial-court date until disposal of the trial.

01Facts

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a second application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 379/2026, registered for alleged offences under Sections 305(e), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 26, 33, 41, 42 and 52 of the Forest Act.

¶ 1

The prosecution alleged that forest officials received information about wood being loaded onto a truck near a brick kiln, seized the truck and wood, and arrested two persons at the scene; the applicant was implicated on the basis of a co-accused’s memorandum statement.

¶ 2, 4

The applicant argued that the wood had been seized from a vehicle in a forest area, not from premises in his possession, and that he had been implicated only through the co-accused’s statement.

¶ 3

The State opposed bail, relying on the circumstances of the seizure and the applicant’s implication.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in the circumstances of the case, including his implication through a co-accused’s memorandum statement and the seizure of the wood from a vehicle in a forest area.

¶ 6–7

03Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides for anticipatory bail.

¶ 1

In deciding the application, the Court considered the nature of the allegations and the circumstances of the applicant’s implication and the seizure.

¶ 6

The offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Forest Act were the alleged offences giving rise to the application; the Court cited no precedent or separate substantive rule concerning those offences.

¶ 1, 6

Provisions in the judgment · 9 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305Section 61Section 3

Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 26Section 33Section 41Section 42Section 52

04Reasoning

The Court weighed the allegations against the circumstances that the applicant’s implication rested on a co-accused’s memorandum statement and that the wood had been seized from a vehicle in a forest area, rather than from premises in the applicant’s possession.

¶ 6

On those grounds, and without expressing an opinion on the merits, it found anticipatory bail appropriate.

¶ 6

05Holding

The Court allowed the application and directed that, if arrested in connection with the specified crime, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail upon executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount.

¶ 7

The applicant must be available for interrogation when required, must not threaten or induce persons acquainted with the case, must not prejudice a fair and expeditious trial, and must attend each trial-court date until disposal of the trial.

¶ 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

HIMANSHU RATHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment