Chhattisgarh High Court

Claim petition is maintainable before the Claims Tribunal within whose local limits the defendant resides.

RAJIYA KHATUN vs KUTUBUDDIN ANSARI

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants are the legal representatives of the deceased, Abdul Salam, who died in a motor vehicle accident on September 10, 2015, at Janjgir-Champa

Source reference: para. 2, 7

They filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, Korba

Source reference: para. 1

The Tribunal dismissed the application on November 28, 2019, ruling that it lacked territorial jurisdiction

Source reference: para. 1, 2

The appellants challenged this dismissal, asserting that Respondent No. 2 (Jahid Khan), the owner of the vehicle, resides in Kusmunda, District Korba, as evidenced by Annexure A-2, which should confer jurisdiction upon the Korba Tribunal

Source reference: para. 2, 7
02

Issues

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Korba has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the claim application under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, based on the residence of the defendant

Source reference: para. 5, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court primarily applied Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Specifically, Section 166(2) provides that an application for compensation may be filed, at the option of the claimant, in the Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction over the area where: (a) the accident occurred; (b) the claimant resides or carries on business; or (c) the defendant resides

Source reference: para. 5, 6
04

Reasoning

The Court scrutinized the statutory options provided under Section 166(2) regarding the forum conveniens for motor accident claims

Source reference: para. 6

It observed that the law grants claimants the choice to file a petition where any of the defendants reside

Source reference: para. 6

In the present case, while the accident occurred outside Korba, the record (Annexure A-2) established that the vehicle owner (Jahid Khan/Respondent No. 2) resides at Kusmunda within District Korba

Source reference: para. 7

The High Court found that the Tribunal’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction ignored this factual residence of the defendant, rendering the lower court’s finding perverse and legally unsustainable under the clear mandate of Section 166(2)

Source reference: para. 2, 7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order dated November 28, 2019

The Court held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Korba, possesses the requisite jurisdiction because the defendant resides within its local limits

Source reference: para. 7

The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for a decision on the merits

Source reference: para. 7

Given that the accident occurred in 2015, the Court directed the Tribunal to decide the claim application within four months from the date of receipt of the order and instructed the parties to appear before the Tribunal on April 13, 2026

Source reference: para. 7, 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAJIYA KHATUNvsKUTUBUDDIN ANSARI

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment