Facts
The appellants are the legal representatives of the deceased, Abdul Salam, who died in a motor vehicle accident on September 10, 2015, at Janjgir-Champa
Source reference: para. 2, 7They filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, Korba
Source reference: para. 1The Tribunal dismissed the application on November 28, 2019, ruling that it lacked territorial jurisdiction
Source reference: para. 1, 2The appellants challenged this dismissal, asserting that Respondent No. 2 (Jahid Khan), the owner of the vehicle, resides in Kusmunda, District Korba, as evidenced by Annexure A-2, which should confer jurisdiction upon the Korba Tribunal
Source reference: para. 2, 7Issues
Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Korba has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the claim application under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, based on the residence of the defendant
Source reference: para. 5, 6Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Specifically, Section 166(2) provides that an application for compensation may be filed, at the option of the claimant, in the Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction over the area where: (a) the accident occurred; (b) the claimant resides or carries on business; or (c) the defendant resides
Source reference: para. 5, 6Reasoning
The Court scrutinized the statutory options provided under Section 166(2) regarding the forum conveniens for motor accident claims
Source reference: para. 6It observed that the law grants claimants the choice to file a petition where any of the defendants reside
Source reference: para. 6In the present case, while the accident occurred outside Korba, the record (Annexure A-2) established that the vehicle owner (Jahid Khan/Respondent No. 2) resides at Kusmunda within District Korba
Source reference: para. 7The High Court found that the Tribunal’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction ignored this factual residence of the defendant, rendering the lower court’s finding perverse and legally unsustainable under the clear mandate of Section 166(2)
Source reference: para. 2, 7Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order dated November 28, 2019
The Court held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Korba, possesses the requisite jurisdiction because the defendant resides within its local limits
Source reference: para. 7The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for a decision on the merits
Source reference: para. 7Given that the accident occurred in 2015, the Court directed the Tribunal to decide the claim application within four months from the date of receipt of the order and instructed the parties to appear before the Tribunal on April 13, 2026
Source reference: para. 7, 8Original Court PDF
RAJIYA KHATUNvsKUTUBUDDIN ANSARI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in