Chhattisgarh High Court

Collector directed to decide Section 165(6) land sale permission application within a prescribed time limit.

VIPRALAV HALDAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 23, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a resident of District Surguja, filed an application on 16.01.2023 before the Collector, Ambikapur (Respondent No. 3), seeking permission to sell rehabilitation land under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959

Source reference: para. 1-2

The application, registered as Proceeding No. 202302021700025, has remained pending for over a year despite the completion of requisite legal formalities and reports

Source reference: para. 2-3

The petitioner cited urgent financial needs, specifically the medical condition of his mother and his children's higher education expenses, as grounds for an expedited decision

Source reference: para. 1-2

The petitioner previously filed WPC No. 1407/2026, which was withdrawn with liberty to file this better-constituted petition

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the Court should issue a writ of mandamus directing the Collector to decide the pending application for the sale of rehabilitation land within a specific timeline

Source reference: para. 1-2
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 165(6) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, which governs the restrictions and requisite permissions from the Collector regarding the transfer of land held by certain classes of holders or under specific conditions, such as rehabilitation land

Source reference: para. 1-3

The court also exercised its discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to ensure the timely performance of statutory duties by public authorities

Source reference: para. 6-7
04

Reasoning

The court observed that the petitioner’s application under Section 165(6) had been pending since early 2023

Source reference: para. 6

It noted that the State, represented by the Deputy Government Advocate, did not oppose a direction for an expedited resolution in accordance with the law

Source reference: para. 4

Considering the prolonged delay and the personal exigencies cited by the petitioner, the court determined that a time-bound direction was necessary to ensure administrative efficiency and provide the petitioner with legal certainty regarding his property rights

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition, answering the issue in the affirmative

The Court directed the Collector, Ambikapur (Respondent No. 3), to consider and decide the petitioner’s application (Proceeding No. 202302021700025) strictly in accordance with the law within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order

Source reference: para. 6
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

VIPRALAV HALDARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 23, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment