Facts
Sheela Khadiya died from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 10 July 2020 involving Trailer No. C.G. 07 B.P. 5655.
Source reference: para. 1Her claimants, Sonafulo Khadiya and Dharam Singh Khadiya, challenged the award dated 29 November 2022 passed by the Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, in Claim Case No. 459/2020, which awarded total compensation of ₹14,49,632.
Source reference: para. 1The appeal was confined to the Tribunal’s failure to grant the applicable 10% enhancement under the conventional heads of loss of estate, funeral expenses, and loss of consortium.
Source reference: para. 2Issues
1. Whether the claimants were entitled to a 10% enhancement in the amounts awarded under the conventional heads in view of the accident having occurred on 10 July 2020 and the principles laid down in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi.
Source reference: paras. 2, 52. Whether both claimants were entitled to separate amounts towards loss of consortium.
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The Court applied the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680, under which the amounts payable towards conventional heads—including loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium—are subject to a 10% enhancement after the prescribed period.
Source reference: para. 5It further recognized that each of the two claimants was entitled to consortium separately.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Tribunal had awarded ₹15,000 towards loss of estate, ₹15,000 towards funeral expenses, and ₹40,000 towards loss of consortium under the conventional heads.
Source reference: para. 5Since the accident occurred in 2020, the Court applied the 10% enhancement mandated by Pranay Sethi, increasing the first two heads to ₹16,500 each and consortium to ₹44,000. As there were two claimants, the consortium amount was calculated at ₹44,000 each, totalling ₹88,000.
Source reference: paras. 5–7The total compensation under the conventional heads was therefore recalculated at ₹1,21,000, as against ₹1,10,000 awarded by the Tribunal, resulting in an additional entitlement of ₹11,000.
Source reference: para. 8Holding
The appeal was partly allowed. The claimants were awarded an additional compensation of ₹11,000 over and above the Tribunal’s award.
The enhanced amount was directed to carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition until realization, while the remaining terms and conditions of the Tribunal’s award were left unaltered.
Source reference: para. 9The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimants in Hindi, with assistance from paralegal workers if necessary.
Source reference: paras. 10–11Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
SONAFULO KHADIYAvsCHANDDEEP MAHTO
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
