Madras High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Criminal appeal abates upon the death of the sole appellant under Section 394 CrPC.

NATARAJ vs STATE REP BY

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Criminal appeal abates upon the death of the sole appellant under Section 394 CrPC.. NATARAJ vs STATE REP BY. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellant, the sole accused, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur, under Section 7 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹5,000 in Spl.S.C.No.2 of 2022 dated 08.11.2022.

Source reference: p.2, para. 2

He filed the present criminal appeal under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Source reference: p.2, para. 2

The sentence was suspended by the High Court on 14.12.2022.

Source reference: p.2, para. 3

During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died; the defence stated that the death occurred on 30.01.2026, while the prosecution produced a Death Certificate recording the date as 31.01.2026.

Source reference: p.2, paras. 3–4
02

Issues

Whether the criminal appeal abated upon the death of the sole appellant during its pendency under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5

Whether any further adjudication on the merits of the conviction and sentence was warranted after the death of the sole appellant.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which provides for the abatement of criminal appeals upon the death of the accused/appellant, subject to the statutory exceptions.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5

Since the appellant was the sole accused and had died during the pendency of the appeal, the appeal could not continue and stood abated.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5

The Court also noted the underlying conviction under Section 7 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, but did not examine its merits after the appellant’s death.

Source reference: p.2, para. 2; p.3, para. 5
04

Reasoning

The appellant’s death was established through the Death Certificate produced by the prosecution.

Source reference: p.2, para. 4

As the deceased was the sole appellant and no surviving appellant remained to prosecute the challenge to the conviction, Section 394 CrPC required the appeal to abate.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5

Consequently, the High Court treated the appellant’s death as dispositive of the pending appeal and found no occasion to consider the merits of the conviction or sentence.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5
05

Holding

The High Court held that, owing to the death of the sole appellant, the criminal appeal abated under Section 394 CrPC.

Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No.1244 of 2022 was dismissed as abated, without any further adjudication on the merits.

Source reference: p.3, para. 5
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20122

Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

NATARAJvsSTATE REP BY

Madras High Court · September 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment